Suppr超能文献

使用VALHUDES方案,比较自我采集与临床医生采集样本时Alinity m HR HPV检测的临床准确性。

Clinical Accuracy of Alinity m HR HPV Assay on Self- versus Clinician-Taken Samples Using the VALHUDES Protocol.

作者信息

Latsuzbaia Ardashel, Van Keer Severien, Vanden Broeck Davy, Weyers Steven, Donders Gilbert, De Sutter Philippe, Tjalma Wiebren, Doyen Jean, Vorsters Alex, Arbyn Marc

机构信息

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2023 Dec;25(12):957-966. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.008. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

Abstract

The VALHUDES protocol was established to evaluate clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays to detect cervical precancer on first-void urine (FVU) and vaginal self-samples versus matched clinician-collected cervical samples (CCSs). Here we evaluated clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV assay in a colposcopy referral population. Home-collected FVU (Colli-Pee FV 5020) 1 day before colposcopy (n = 492), at-clinic collected dry vaginal self-samples [multi-Collect Swab (mC; n = 493), followed by Evalyn Brush (EB; n = 233) or Qvintip (QT; n = 260)] and matched CCSs, were available for the study. Sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2) of Alinity testing on FVU (ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03), mC (ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06), and EB/QT (ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00) was not different to CCSs. Specificity on FVU was similar to CCS (ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10), whereas specificity on mC was lower (ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90), but on EB/QT was higher (ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15) than on CCS. Accuracy on EB (sensitivity ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05; specificity ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31) was slightly better than on QT (sensitivity ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.03; specificity ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92-1.09). In conclusion, clinical sensitivity of Alinity assay on all self-sample types was similar to cervical specimens. Adjustment of signal thresholds improved assay's accuracy to detect CIN2 in all self-sample types.

摘要

VALHUDES方案旨在评估人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测在首次晨尿(FVU)和阴道自我采样中检测宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床准确性,并与临床医生采集的匹配宫颈样本(CCS)进行对比。在此,我们评估了Alinity m HR HPV检测在阴道镜转诊人群中的临床性能。在阴道镜检查前1天自行采集的FVU(Colli-Pee FV 5020,n = 492)、在诊所采集的干燥阴道自我样本[多次采集拭子(mC;n = 493),随后是Evalyn刷(EB;n = 233)或Qvintip(QT;n = 260)]以及匹配的CCS可用于该研究。Alinity检测在FVU(比值,0.94;95%CI,0.85 - 1.03)、mC(比值,1.00;95%CI,0.94 - 1.06)和EB/QT(比值,0.92;95%CI,0.85 - 1.00)上检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或更高(CIN2)的敏感性与CCS无差异。FVU的特异性与CCS相似(比值,1.02;95%CI,0.95 - 1.10),而mC的特异性较低(比值,0.83;95%CI,0.76 - 0.90),但EB/QT的特异性高于CCS(比值,1.08;95%CI,1.01 - 1.15)。EB的准确性(敏感性比值,0.96;95%CI,0.87 - 1.05;特异性比值,1.18;95%CI,1.06 - 1.31)略优于QT(敏感性比值,0.88;95%CI,0.75 - 1.03;特异性比值,1.00;95%CI,0.92 - 1.09)。总之,Alinity检测在所有自我采样类型上的临床敏感性与宫颈样本相似。调整信号阈值可提高该检测在所有自我采样类型中检测CIN2的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验