Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停后自主循环恢复患者的动脉-呼气末二氧化碳梯度:一项回顾性研究。

Out-of-Hospital Arterial to End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Gradient in Patients With Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Division of General Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria.

Division of General Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;82(5):558-563. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

End-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO) is used to guide ventilation after achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in certain out-of-hospital systems, despite an unknown difference between arterial and end-tidal CO (partial pressure of carbon dioxide [paCO]-etCO difference) levels in this population. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the paCO-etCO difference in out-of-hospital patients with ROSC after nontraumatic cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients aged 18 years and older with sustained ROSC after nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In patients with an existing out-of-hospital arterial blood gas analysis within 30 minutes after achieving ROSC, matching etCO values were evaluated. Linear regression and Bland-Altman plot analysis were performed to ascertain the primary endpoint of interest.

RESULTS

We included data of 60 patients in the final analysis. The mean paCO-etCO difference was 32 (±18) mmHg. Only a moderate correlation (R=0.453) between paCO and etCO was found. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 32 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 27 to 36) [the upper limit of agreement of 67 mmHg (95% CI, 59 to 74) and the lower limit of agreement of -3 mmHg (95% CI, -11 to 5)].

CONCLUSION

The paCO-etCO difference in patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is far from physiologic ranges, and the between-patient variability is high. Therefore, etCO-guided adaption of ventilation might not provide adequate accuracy in this setting.

摘要

研究目的

在某些院外系统中,即使在该人群中动脉和呼气末二氧化碳(二氧化碳分压[paCO]-呼气末二氧化碳差异)水平之间存在未知差异,呼气末二氧化碳(etCO)仍用于指导自主循环恢复(ROSC)后的通气。本研究的主要目的是评估和量化院外非创伤性心搏骤停后 ROSC 患者的 paCO-etCO 差异。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、持续 ROSC 后发生非创伤性院外心搏骤停的患者。在 ROSC 后 30 分钟内存在现有院外动脉血气分析的患者中,评估了匹配的 etCO 值。进行线性回归和 Bland-Altman 图分析,以确定主要研究终点。

结果

我们最终分析纳入了 60 例患者的数据。paCO-etCO 差异的平均值为 32(±18)mmHg。仅发现 paCO 与 etCO 之间存在中度相关性(R=0.453)。Bland-Altman 分析显示 32mmHg 的偏差(95%置信区间[CI],27 至 36)[上限一致性为 67mmHg(95%CI,59 至 74)和下限一致性为-3mmHg(95%CI,-11 至 5)]。

结论

院外心搏骤停后 ROSC 患者的 paCO-etCO 差异远非生理范围,且患者间的变异性很高。因此,在这种情况下,基于 etCO 的通气适应性调整可能无法提供足够的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验