ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy; Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Dent Mater. 2024 Jan;40(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
VEGF is prototypic marker of neovascularization, repeatedly proposed as intrinsic characteristic of peri-implantitis. This study aimed to assess pattern of VEGF in peri-implantitis, its correlation with titanium particles (TPs) and capacity as respective biomarker.
Pathological specificity of VEGF was assessed in peri-implant granulations using immunohistochemistry, periodontal granulations represented Ti-free positive controls. VEGF was correlated to TPs, identified using scanning electron microscopy coupled with dispersive x-ray spectrometry. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of VEGF were estimated in PICF specimens from peri-implantitis, peri-implant mucositis (PIM) and healthy peri-implant tissues (HI) using machine learning algorithms.
Peri-implantitis exhibited rich neovascular network with expressed density in contact zones toward neutrophil infiltrates without specific pattern variations around TPs, identified in all peri-implantitis specimens (mean particle size 8.9 ± 24.8 µm; Ti-mass (%) 0.380 ± 0.163). VEGF was significantly more expressed in peri-implantitis (47,065 ± 24.2) compared to periodontitis (31,14 ± 9.15), and positively correlated with its soluble concentrations in PICF (p = 0.01). VEGF was positively correlated to all clinical endpoints and significantly increased in peri-implantitis compared to both PIM and HI, but despite high specificity (96%), its overall diagnostic capacity was average. Two patient clusters were identified in peri-implantitis, one with 8-fold higher VEGF values compared to HI, and second with lower values comparable to PIM.
VEGF accurately reflects neovascularization in peri-implantitis that was expressed in contact zones toward implant surface without specific histopathological patter variation around TPs. VEGF answered requests for biomarker of peri-implantitis but further research is necessary to decrypt its exact underlying cause.
VEGF 是血管新生的典型标志物,反复被提出是种植体周围炎的固有特征。本研究旨在评估种植体周围炎中 VEGF 的模式,及其与钛颗粒(TPs)的相关性和作为各自生物标志物的能力。
使用免疫组织化学评估种植体周围肉芽组织中 VEGF 的病理特异性,牙周肉芽组织作为无 Ti 的阳性对照。使用扫描电子显微镜结合分散 X 射线光谱法,将 VEGF 与 TPs 相关联,这些 TPs 是通过该方法识别的。使用机器学习算法,在种植体周围炎、种植体周围黏膜炎(PIM)和健康种植体组织(HI)的 PICF 标本中,评估 VEGF 的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性。
种植体周围炎表现出丰富的新生血管网络,在接触区向中性粒细胞浸润表达密度,在所有种植体周围炎标本中都没有特定的 TPs 周围模式变化(平均颗粒大小 8.9±24.8μm;Ti 质量(%)0.380±0.163)。与牙周炎(31,14±9.15)相比,种植体周围炎中的 VEGF 表达显著更高(47,065±24.2),并与 PICF 中的可溶性浓度呈正相关(p=0.01)。VEGF 与所有临床终点呈正相关,与 PIM 和 HI 相比,在种植体周围炎中显著增加,但尽管特异性高(96%),但其总体诊断能力中等。在种植体周围炎中确定了两个患者聚类,一个聚类的 VEGF 值比 HI 高 8 倍,第二个聚类的 VEGF 值比 PIM 低,但与 PIM 相当。
VEGF 准确反映了种植体周围炎中的血管新生,这种新生在接触区朝向种植体表面表达,而没有在 TPs 周围出现特定的组织病理学模式变化。VEGF 回答了种植体周围炎生物标志物的需求,但需要进一步研究来解密其确切的潜在原因。