Department of General Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 901, Zhonghua Road, Yongkang District, Tainan City, New Taipei City, 71004, Taiwan.
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Number 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 21;13(1):18010. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45380-0.
Post-operative pain and bleeding are the main complications following hemorrhoidal surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether an absorbable gelatin sponge is a superior hemostatic and analgesic agent compared to gauze soaked in epinephrine for post-hemorrhoidal surgery care. A retrospective study was conducted using data from a single institute. Data were collected from the electronic medical record database and outpatient patient questionnaire archive. The study encompassed 143 patients who received gauze soaked in epinephrine as the hemostatic agent after hemorrhoidal surgery and 148 patients who received an absorbable gelatin sponge. Most patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy, with 119 (83.2%) in epinephrine group and 118 (79.7%) in gelatin sponge group. The primary outcome measurements were postoperative pain score, oral analgesic dosage and complications. Patients in the absorbable gelatin sponge group reported significantly lower pain scores from 8 h after their hemorrhoidal surgery (postoperative day 0) through postoperative day 2. The average pain scores in the absorbable gelatin sponge group and gauze soaked in epinephrine group were 5.3 ± 3.2 and 6.2 ± 3.2 (p = 0.03) on postoperative 8 h; 4.7 ± 3.0 and 5.8 ± 2.9 (p ≤ 0.01) on postoperative day one; and 4.4 ± 2.8 and 5.3 ± 2.9 (p = 0.01) on postoperative day two, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative recovery or complication rates between the two groups. Our study revealed that absorbable gelatin sponges provide more effective pain relief to patients during the initial postoperative days after hemorrhoidal surgery, without any adverse impact on patient outcomes. Consequently, absorbable gelatin sponges are recommended as a replacement for gauze soaked in epinephrine following hemorrhoidal surgery.
术后疼痛和出血是痔手术后的主要并发症。本研究旨在探讨与肾上腺素浸湿纱布相比,可吸收明胶海绵是否是一种更有效的止血和镇痛剂,用于痔手术后的护理。本研究采用单中心回顾性研究,数据来自电子病历数据库和门诊患者问卷调查档案。该研究纳入了 143 例接受肾上腺素浸湿纱布作为止血剂的痔手术后患者和 148 例接受可吸收明胶海绵的患者。大多数患者接受吻合器痔上黏膜环切术,肾上腺素组 119 例(83.2%),明胶海绵组 118 例(79.7%)。主要观察指标为术后疼痛评分、口服镇痛剂量和并发症。明胶海绵组患者在痔手术后 8 小时(术后第 0 天)至术后第 2 天的疼痛评分显著低于肾上腺素组。明胶海绵组和肾上腺素组术后 8 小时的平均疼痛评分分别为 5.3±3.2 和 6.2±3.2(p=0.03);术后第 1 天分别为 4.7±3.0 和 5.8±2.9(p≤0.01);术后第 2 天分别为 4.4±2.8 和 5.3±2.9(p=0.01)。两组患者术后恢复或并发症发生率无显著差异。本研究表明,与肾上腺素浸湿纱布相比,可吸收明胶海绵可在痔手术后的最初几天内为患者提供更有效的疼痛缓解,且对患者结局无不良影响。因此,建议在痔手术后用可吸收明胶海绵代替肾上腺素浸湿纱布。