Suppr超能文献

与中国老年人弱握力和非对称握力相关的风险因素。

Risk factors associated with weak and asymmetric handgrip strength in older Chinese adults.

机构信息

Zigong Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Zigong Psychiatric Research Center, Zigong, China.

出版信息

Am J Hum Biol. 2024 Apr;36(4):e24007. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.24007. Epub 2023 Oct 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the potential risk factors associated with weak and asymmetric handgrip strength (HGS) in older Chinese adults.

METHODS

A total of 2702 participants aged ≥65 years from the two waves of data (2011 and 2013) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were analyzed. The highest recorded HGS values (Method A) or the average HGS values (Method B) for the dominant hand were used to compute the HGS asymmetry (nondominant HGS/dominant HGS out of 0.9-1.1) and HGS weakness (male <28 kg, female <18 kg). Risk factors associated with the weak and asymmetric HGS were identified by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Risk factors associated with weak and asymmetric HGS of varying severity differed between the two methods. Both methods identified age and illiteracy as risk factors for weak HGS with 10%-20% asymmetry. Method A also identified speech impediment, stroke, and sleep duration as additional risk factors. Similarly, both methods identified age, illiteracy, primary school education and below, diabetes, and stroke as risk factors for weak HGS and asymmetry over 30.1%. Method B additionally identified a history of falls as a risk factor. However, apart from age, the risk factors for weak HGS with 20.1%-30% asymmetry differed between the two methods-Method A identified kidney disease, while Method B identified illiteracy and asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that risk factors associated with the abnormal HGS in older adults varied based on the methods used to define these conditions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨与老年中国人握力弱和不对称相关的潜在危险因素。

方法

对来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2011 年和 2013 年两轮数据的 2702 名年龄≥65 岁的参与者进行分析。使用记录的最高握力值(方法 A)或惯用手的平均握力值(方法 B)计算握力不对称性(非优势手握力/优势手握力的 0.9-1.1 倍)和握力减弱(男性<28kg,女性<18kg)。采用 logistic 回归分析确定与弱握力和不对称握力相关的危险因素。

结果

两种方法确定的与握力强弱和不对称程度不同的危险因素存在差异。两种方法均发现年龄和文盲是握力弱(不对称性 10%-20%)的危险因素。方法 A 还发现言语障碍、中风和睡眠时长是额外的危险因素。同样,两种方法均发现年龄、文盲、小学及以下教育程度、糖尿病和中风是握力弱和不对称性超过 30.1%的危险因素。方法 B 还发现有跌倒史是一个危险因素。然而,除了年龄,握力弱(不对称性 20.1%-30%)的危险因素在两种方法之间存在差异——方法 A 发现肾病,而方法 B 发现文盲和哮喘。

结论

结果表明,与老年人异常握力相关的危险因素因定义这些情况的方法而异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验