McClennan B L
Radiology. 1987 Jan;162(1 Pt 1):1-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786748.
After more than 30 years of experience in the United States with high-osmolality, ionic, radiopaque contrast media (HOCM), low-osmolality contrast media (LOCM), both ionic and nonionic, have recently been introduced into the marketplace. Under the current atmosphere of cost controls (prospective payment system) and consumerism in medicine, the higher cost of these newer agents has sparked heated debate, with the lingering question, "Can we afford to use them?" The new LOCM are not the only "expensive" drugs undergoing an economically constrained introduction into clinical practice, but they represent a significant challenge for radiologists in terms of our doctor-patient relationships and the monetarization of medical care. Review of the extensive literature documenting improvement in patient acceptance, tolerance, and safety, with equal or improved diagnostic efficacy, suggests that the question now at hand is, "Can we afford not to use them?" This premise is discussed with text and references designed to aid the practicing radiologist and referring physician in developing guidelines for utilization of the new LOCM.
在美国,高渗性、离子型、不透射线的造影剂(HOCM)已经应用了30多年,而低渗性造影剂(LOCM),包括离子型和非离子型,最近才进入市场。在当前医疗成本控制(前瞻性支付系统)和消费主义的氛围下,这些新型造影剂的较高成本引发了激烈的争论,一直存在的问题是:“我们用得起吗?”新型低渗性造影剂并非唯一在经济限制下引入临床实践的“昂贵”药物,但就我们的医患关系和医疗货币化而言,它们对放射科医生构成了重大挑战。回顾大量文献,这些文献记录了患者接受度、耐受性和安全性的改善,以及同等或更好的诊断效果,这表明现在的问题是:“我们不用得起吗?”本文将通过文字和参考文献来讨论这一前提,以帮助执业放射科医生和转诊医生制定使用新型低渗性造影剂的指南。