Suppr超能文献

阈下抑郁症:非药物干预的系统评价与网状Meta分析

Subthreshold Depression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Non-Pharmacological Interventions.

作者信息

Hao Xiaofei, Jia Yuying, Chen Jie, Zou Chuan, Jiang Cuinan

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.

Department of Outpatient, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610083, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Oct 16;19:2149-2169. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S425509. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subthreshold depression (StD) is considered to be the "precursor" stage of major depressive disorder (MDD), which could cause higher risk of suicide, disease burden and functional impairment. There have been various non-pharmacological interventions for StD. However, the comparison of their effectiveness still lacks sufficient evidence. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate and rank the efficacy of multiple non-pharmacological interventions targeting StD.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search across various databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO from inception to December 2022. All included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with StD compared with control group (CG). Several universal scales for measuring depression severity were used as efficacy outcomes. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to separately rank each intervention using the "Stata 17.0" software.

RESULTS

A total of thirty-six trials were included, involving twenty-eight interventions and 7417 participants. The research found that most non-pharmacological interventions were superior to controls for StD. In each outcome evaluation by different scales for measuring depression, psychotherapy always ranked first in terms of treatment effectiveness, especially Problem-solving Therapy (PST), Behavioral Activation Therapy (BAT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)/Internet-based CBT (I-CBT)/Telephone-based CBT (T-CBT). Since different groups could not be directly compared, the total optimal intervention could not be determined.

CONCLUSION

Here, we show that psychotherapy may be the better choice for the treatment of StD. This study provides some evidence on StD management selection for clinical workers. However, to establish its intervention effect more conclusively, the content, format and operators of psychotherapy still require extensive exploration to conduct more effective, convenient and cost-effective implementation in primary healthcare. Notably, further research is also urgently needed to find the biological and neural mechanisms of StD by examining whether psychotherapy alters neuroplasticity in patients with StD.

摘要

背景

阈下抑郁(StD)被认为是重度抑郁症(MDD)的“前驱”阶段,它会导致更高的自杀风险、疾病负担和功能损害。针对StD已经有多种非药物干预措施。然而,它们有效性的比较仍缺乏充分证据。我们进行了一项系统评价和网状Meta分析,以评估和排序针对StD的多种非药物干预措施的疗效。

方法

我们对包括PubMed、Medline、Embase、Web of Science和PsycINFO在内的多个数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间从建库至2022年12月。所有纳入研究均为针对StD患者的非药物干预与对照组(CG)比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用几种通用的抑郁严重程度测量量表作为疗效指标。使用“Stata 17.0”软件通过累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)分别对每种干预措施进行排序。

结果

共纳入36项试验,涉及28种干预措施和7417名参与者。研究发现,大多数非药物干预措施治疗StD优于对照组。在使用不同量表测量抑郁的各项结局评估中,心理治疗在治疗效果方面总是排名第一,尤其是问题解决疗法(PST)、行为激活疗法(BAT)、认知行为疗法(CBT)/基于互联网的CBT(I-CBT)/基于电话的CBT(T-CBT)。由于不同组之间无法直接比较,因此无法确定总体最佳干预措施。

结论

在此,我们表明心理治疗可能是治疗StD的更好选择。本研究为临床工作者在StD管理选择方面提供了一些证据。然而,为了更确凿地确定其干预效果,心理治疗的内容、形式和实施者仍需要广泛探索,以便在基层医疗保健中更有效、便捷且经济高效地实施。值得注意的是,还迫切需要进一步研究,通过检查心理治疗是否改变StD患者的神经可塑性来找到StD的生物学和神经机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9b6/10588757/2fdd65427535/NDT-19-2149-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验