• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国居民在区域性疫情爆发期间对 COVID-19 疫苗相关错误信息的识别。

COVID-19 vaccine-related misinformation identification among Chinese residents during a regional outbreak.

机构信息

School of Journalism and Communication/National Media and Experimental Teaching Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

College of Media and International Culture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 6;11:1258466. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258466. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258466
PMID:37869207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10587398/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Misinformation about the COVID vaccines poses a significant challenge to vaccination efforts in many countries. This study examined Chinese citizens' ability to correctly identify COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in geographic areas with and without a regional outbreak. We also investigated the associations between misinformation identification and information source usage, source trust, perceived information quality, and demographic characteristics.

SETTING

The online survey was conducted in four cities from June 8th to 15th, 2021 in Guangdong Province, two of which were experiencing a regional surge of COVID-19 delta variant infections, and four cities in Hunan Province, a neighboring province largely unaffected.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 4,479 individuals aged 18 and above completed the online questionnaire. Given survey length, those who finished the study under 5 min were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 3,800.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Misinformation identification, source exposure, source trust, and perceived information quality.

RESULTS

Results showed slightly higher levels of correct misinformation identification in surge vs. non-surge areas. Trust in official information sources was positively associated with correct misinformation identification in full sample analysis, while trust in informal sources was negatively associated with the same outcome. Perceived information quality was positively associated with correct misinformation identification in the full sample.

CONCLUSION

Information providers in China should enhance the quality of the vaccine information they provide, and the Chinese public should balance their usage of different sources of information to acquire vaccine knowledge.

摘要

目的

有关新冠疫苗的错误信息给许多国家的疫苗接种工作带来了重大挑战。本研究考察了中国公民在有和没有地区性疫情爆发的地理区域识别新冠疫苗错误信息的能力。我们还调查了错误信息识别与信息来源使用、来源信任、感知信息质量和人口统计学特征之间的关联。

设置

这项在线调查于 2021 年 6 月 8 日至 15 日在广东省的四个城市进行,其中两个城市正在经历新冠病毒 delta 变异感染的区域性激增,而四个城市在湖南省,一个受影响较小的邻近省份。

参与者

共有 4479 名 18 岁及以上的人完成了在线问卷。由于调查长度的原因,那些在 5 分钟内完成研究的人被排除在外,最终样本为 3800 人。

结果测量

错误信息识别、来源暴露、来源信任和感知信息质量。

结果

结果显示,在疫情地区和非疫情地区,正确识别错误信息的水平略高。在全样本分析中,对官方信息源的信任与正确识别错误信息呈正相关,而对非正式信息源的信任与同样的结果呈负相关。感知信息质量与全样本中的正确错误信息识别呈正相关。

结论

中国的信息提供者应提高他们提供的疫苗信息质量,而中国公众应平衡使用不同的信息来源来获取疫苗知识。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 vaccine-related misinformation identification among Chinese residents during a regional outbreak.中国居民在区域性疫情爆发期间对 COVID-19 疫苗相关错误信息的识别。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 6;11:1258466. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258466. eCollection 2023.
2
Heuristic Information Processing as a Mediating Factor in the Process of Exposure to COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Misinformation Sharing on Social Media.启发式信息处理在社交媒体上接触 COVID-19 疫苗信息和错误信息分享过程中的中介作用。
Health Commun. 2024 Nov;39(12):2779-2792. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2288373. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Infodemic, Institutional Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-National Survey.信息疫情、机构信任与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:一项跨国调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138033.
4
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.调查和提高美国公民对新冠疫情的认知准确性:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 12;23(1):e24069. doi: 10.2196/24069.
5
Misinformation, perceptions towards COVID-19 and willingness to be vaccinated: A population-based survey in Yemen.错误信息、对 COVID-19 的看法和接种意愿:也门的一项基于人群的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0248325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248325. eCollection 2021.
6
Direct and Indirect Associations of Media Use With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.直接和间接关联的媒体使用与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫在韩国:横断面网络调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 6;24(1):e32329. doi: 10.2196/32329.
7
Do Socioeconomic Disparities Matter? Unraveling the Impacts of Online Vaccine Misinformation on Vaccination Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.社会经济差距重要吗?在中国 COVID-19 大流行期间,揭示在线疫苗错误信息对疫苗接种意愿的影响。
J Health Commun. 2023 Feb 1;28(2):91-101. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2185320. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
8
A matter of trust: a qualitative comparison of the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Taiwan, the United States, the Netherlands, and Haiti.信任问题:对台湾、美国、荷兰和海地 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的决定因素进行定性比较。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2050121. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2050121. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Association of Major Depressive Symptoms With Endorsement of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation Among US Adults.主要抑郁症状与美国成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的认可之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2145697. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45697.
10
Investigating the role of source and source trust in prebunks and debunks of misinformation in online experiments across four EU countries.调查在四个欧盟国家的在线实验中,信息源和信息源信任在虚假信息的预先反驳和反驳中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):20723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71599-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of scalable, wordless, short, animated storytelling videos on hope in China: a nationwide, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.可扩展、无文字、简短的动画叙事视频对中国希望感的影响:一项全国性、单盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 20;15:04140. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04140.

本文引用的文献

1
Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media: The role of anxiety during COVID-19.在社交媒体上相信并分享错误信息、事实核查及准确信息:新冠疫情期间焦虑情绪的作用。
New Media Soc. 2023 Jan;25(1):141-162. doi: 10.1177/14614448211011451.
2
Differences in Sources of Information, Risk Perception, and Cognitive Appraisals between People with Various Latent Classes of Motivation to Get Vaccinated against COVID-19 and Previous Seasonal Influenza Vaccination: Facebook Survey Study with Latent Profile Analysis in Taiwan.不同潜在类别动机人群在新冠病毒疫苗和既往季节性流感疫苗接种方面的信息来源、风险认知及认知评估差异:台湾地区基于潜在剖面分析的脸书调查研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;9(10):1203. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101203.
3
Transmission Dynamics of an Outbreak of the COVID-19 Delta Variant B.1.617.2 - Guangdong Province, China, May-June 2021.2021年5月至6月中国广东省新冠病毒德尔塔变异株B.1.617.2疫情的传播动力学
China CDC Wkly. 2021 Jul 2;3(27):584-586. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.148.
4
Tracking the Influence of Misinformation on Elderly People's Perceptions and Intention to Accept COVID-19 Vaccines.追踪错误信息对老年人对新冠疫苗的认知及接种意愿的影响。
Health Commun. 2023 May;38(5):855-865. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1980251. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
5
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
6
The Credibility of Health Information Sources as Predictors of Attitudes toward Vaccination-The Results from a Longitudinal Study in Poland.健康信息来源的可信度作为疫苗接种态度预测因素——波兰一项纵向研究的结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 23;9(8):933. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080933.
7
Primary Source of Information About COVID-19 as a Determinant of Perception of COVID-19 Severity and Vaccine Uptake : Source of Information and COVID-19.关于 COVID-19 的主要信息来源对 COVID-19 严重程度和疫苗接种接受度的感知的影响:信息来源与 COVID-19。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3088-3095. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07080-1. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
Misinformation Exposure and Acceptance: The Role of Information Seeking and Processing.错误信息暴露与接受:信息寻求和处理的作用。
Health Commun. 2023 Mar;38(3):585-593. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1964187. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
COVID-19 Misinformation Online and Health Literacy: A Brief Overview.新冠病毒在线错误信息与健康素养:简要概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158091.
10
Can Communication Strategies Combat COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy with Trade-Off between Public Service Messages and Public Skepticism? Experimental Evidence from Pakistan.沟通策略能否在权衡公益信息与公众怀疑态度的情况下对抗新冠疫苗犹豫?来自巴基斯坦的实验证据。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 7;9(7):757. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9070757.