Suppr超能文献

Impella作为心肌梗死后室间隔缺损封堵的桥梁:病例系列

Impella as a bridge-to-closure in post-infarction ventricular septal defect: a case series.

作者信息

Jalli Sandeep, Spinelli Kateri J, Kirker Eric B, Venkataraman Ashok, Abraham Jacob

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Samaritan Health Services, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science, Providence Heart Institute, Providence St.Joseph Health, 9427 SW Barnes Rd, Suite 594, Portland, OR, 97225, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023 Oct 12;7(10):ytad500. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad500. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is a rare, life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Few studies report the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for the treatment of cardiogenic shock in this setting. We describe our experience using a microaxial, transvalvular device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) as a bridge-to-closure for PIVSD.

CASE SUMMARY

We identified 13 patients from two centres with cardiogenic shock due to PIVSD who received an Impella device between January 2016 and February 2022. Nine patients were transferred from another hospital, three with MCS devices [two intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), 1 Impella CP]. Eight patients received Impella 5.0, three received Impella 5.5 (one escalated from Impella CP), and two received Impella CP. The median time from AMI to Impella insertion was 5 (3-6) days. Five patients died on Impella support without an attempt to close the ventricular septum (VSD). Seven patients underwent successful VSD closure: six had surgical and one had percutaneous closure. One patient died during attempted percutaneous closure. Time from Impella insertion to VSD closure was 10.5 (7.8-14.0) days. Time from AMI to Impella was 5.0 (2.0-5.3) days in the group that survived to closure, and 6.0 (4.0-7.0) days in those who did not. Thirty-day mortality was 46%.

DISCUSSION

Support with Impella improved clinical stability in most patients, yet multi-system organ failure leading to death occurred in many patients. Patients who survived closure had earlier time from AMI to Impella, underscoring that prompt recognition of PIVSD and initiation of MCS may improve survival to surgical or percutaneous closure.

摘要

背景

心肌梗死后室间隔缺损(PIVSD)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)一种罕见的、危及生命的并发症。很少有研究报道在这种情况下使用机械循环支持(MCS)治疗心源性休克。我们描述了使用一种微轴经瓣膜装置(美国马萨诸塞州丹弗斯市Abiomed公司的Impella)作为PIVSD封堵桥接治疗的经验。

病例总结

我们从两个中心确定了13例因PIVSD导致心源性休克的患者,他们在2016年1月至2022年2月期间接受了Impella装置治疗。9例患者从另一家医院转入,其中3例已使用MCS装置[2例主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP),1例Impella CP]。8例患者接受了Impella 5.0,3例接受了Impella 5.5(其中1例从Impella CP升级),2例接受了Impella CP。从AMI到插入Impella的中位时间为5(3 - 6)天。5例患者在Impella支持下死亡,未尝试封堵室间隔(VSD)。7例患者成功进行了VSD封堵:6例接受了手术封堵,1例接受了经皮封堵。1例患者在经皮封堵尝试过程中死亡。从插入Impella到VSD封堵的时间为10.5(7.8 - 14.0)天。存活至封堵的患者从AMI到Impella的时间为5.0(2.0 - 5.3)天,未存活者为6.0(4.0 - 7.0)天。30天死亡率为46%。

讨论

Impella支持改善了大多数患者的临床稳定性,但许多患者仍发生多系统器官衰竭导致死亡。存活至封堵的患者从AMI到Impella的时间更早,这强调了及时识别PIVSD并启动MCS可能提高手术或经皮封堵的生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e753/10588615/199f68097c60/ytad500f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验