Universiteit Utrecht (UU), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 2):117469. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117469. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Scientists and scientific institutions are adopting more extensive participatory models, hoping to revisit the existing relationship between science and society. Though citizen science has become more common in environmental monitoring, it is seldom utilized in environmental epidemiology. In the CitieS-Health project, we co-created epidemiological studies with citizens in five European countries. The aim of this paper is to share our experiences and impart methodological insight into the application of co-created citizen science strategies in environmental epidemiology. METHODS: We applied the CitieS-Health framework, involving citizens in all the phases of the studies: identifying research questions, designing research protocols, collecting data, analysing data, interpreting data, formulating conclusions, authoring scientific articles and communicating the results to diverse audiences. These epidemiological studies, conducted in specific areas in Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain, covered diverse local environmental issues and health effects ranging from air pollution and mental health to industrial pollution and kidney disease. RESULTS: Together with citizens, we successfully conducted environmental epidemiological studies that generated new scientific knowledge reflecting the concerns and knowledge of citizens. Citizens contributed in all the research activities, including activities beyond formulating the research questions, though the researchers initiated several design discussions and conducted time-consuming and complex tasks (e.g. data analysis, measurement of specific exposures and health outcomes). The challenges we encountered were engaging effectively with citizens throughout the study, harmonizing citizens' knowledge and values with the academics' expertise, managing civic expectations, making complex concepts understandable to citizens and representativeness of participating citizens. The co-created studies were able to empower citizens to address local health concerns by sharing and using scientific knowledge generated from studies. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of co-created citizen science in environmental epidemiology is feasible and has the potential to improve the quality of research whilst promoting civic trust in research and results.
背景与目的:科学家和科研机构正在采用更广泛的参与式模式,希望重新审视科学与社会之间现有的关系。尽管公民科学在环境监测中已经变得更加普遍,但它在环境流行病学中很少被使用。在 CitieS-Health 项目中,我们与五个欧洲国家的公民共同开展了流行病学研究。本文旨在分享我们的经验,并为将共同创造的公民科学策略应用于环境流行病学提供方法学见解。
方法:我们应用了 CitieS-Health 框架,让公民参与研究的所有阶段:确定研究问题、设计研究方案、收集数据、分析数据、解释数据、得出结论、撰写科学文章以及向不同受众传达研究结果。这些在意大利、立陶宛、荷兰、斯洛文尼亚和西班牙特定地区进行的流行病学研究涵盖了从空气污染和心理健康到工业污染和肾脏疾病等各种当地环境问题和健康影响。
结果:我们与公民一起成功地开展了环境流行病学研究,这些研究产生了新的科学知识,反映了公民的关切和知识。公民在所有的研究活动中都做出了贡献,包括在提出研究问题之外的活动,尽管研究人员发起了几次设计讨论,并进行了耗时且复杂的任务(例如数据分析、特定暴露和健康结果的测量)。我们遇到的挑战是在整个研究过程中有效地与公民互动,协调公民的知识和价值观与学者的专业知识,管理公民的期望,使公民能够理解复杂的概念,并使参与的公民具有代表性。共同创造的研究使公民能够通过分享和使用从研究中产生的科学知识来解决当地的健康问题。
结论:将共同创造的公民科学纳入环境流行病学是可行的,它有潜力提高研究质量,同时增强公民对研究和结果的信任。
J Environ Manage. 2022-1-15
Sensors (Basel). 2022-4-21
Front Public Health. 2024