Zhao Zhenni, Li Jiawei, Wen Jiamin, He Yanyan, Sun Zhiling
Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Oct 18;19:811-827. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S429469. eCollection 2023.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Moxibustion is effective for low back pain (LBP), and inflammatory cytokines may play an important role in the mechanism of moxibustion treatment. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore the mechanism of moxibustion in LBP in terms of inflammatory cytokines. METHODS: We searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There was no restriction on the publication date. RESULTS: Thirty RCTs measuring interleukin (IL-) 1, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-) α were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to controls: single moxibustion could effectively decrease levels IL-6 and IL-23 (SMD, -0.71, 95% CI: -1.25 to -0.17, = 0.01; SMD, -1.61, 95% CI: -2.20 to -1.03, < 0.01, respectively); combined moxibustion had significant effects on IL-1, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-17, and TNF-α ( < 0.05). Overall, for LBP, single or combined moxibustion could effectively down-regulate levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines ( = 0.007 and < 0.00001, respectively). For safety of moxibustion, the incidence rate of side effects was similar to that of controls (RD, -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.01, = 0.59). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled estimates were robust, and publication bias analysis showed there was a significant small study effect (Egger's test = 0.0000). High statistical heterogeneity existed between included RCTs, meta-regression showed there was no potential factor explaining the source of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: For LBP, moxibustion can effectively decrease levels of IL-1, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α to achieve analgesia. Because the side effects of moxibustion are transient, it is relatively safe for clinical use. However, based on high heterogeneity in this meta-analysis, rigorously designed RCTs are required to further confirm the results in this review.
背景与目的:艾灸对腰痛有效,炎症细胞因子可能在艾灸治疗机制中发挥重要作用。本荟萃分析的目的是从炎症细胞因子方面探讨艾灸治疗腰痛的机制。 方法:我们检索了中国知网、万方数据库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed和Web of Science,以确定符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。对发表日期无限制。 结果:本荟萃分析纳入了30项测量白细胞介素(IL-)1、IL-1β、IL-6、IL-12、IL-17、IL-23和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-)α的RCT。与对照组相比:单纯艾灸可有效降低IL-6和IL-23水平(标准化均数差[SMD]分别为-0.71,95%可信区间[CI]:-1.25至-0.17,P = 0.01;SMD为-1.61,95%CI:-2.20至-1.03,P < 0.01);联合艾灸对IL-1、IL-1β、IL-6、IL-12、IL-17和TNF-α有显著影响(P < 0.05)。总体而言,对于腰痛,单纯或联合艾灸均可有效下调促炎细胞因子水平(P分别为0.007和P < 0.00001)。关于艾灸的安全性,副作用发生率与对照组相似(风险差[RD]为-0.01,95%CI:-0.02至0.01,P = 0.59)。敏感性分析表明合并估计值稳健,发表偏倚分析表明存在显著的小研究效应(Egger检验P = 0.0000)。纳入的RCT之间存在高度统计学异质性,Meta回归显示没有潜在因素可解释异质性来源。 结论:对于腰痛,艾灸可有效降低IL-1、IL-1β、IL-6、IL-12、IL-17、IL-23和TNF-α水平以实现镇痛。由于艾灸的副作用是短暂的,临床使用相对安全。然而,基于本荟萃分析中的高度异质性,需要严格设计的RCT来进一步证实本综述中的结果。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023-10-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2020-2-29
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020-9-8
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022-5-18
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-10-11
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022-5-18
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021-10-12
Am J Transl Res. 2021-5-15
Lancet. 2021-7-3