Suppr超能文献

烧伤手术前安非他命阳性不会对术中结果产生不利影响。

Amphetamine Positivity Prior to Burn Surgery Does not Adversely Affect Intraoperative Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 770 Welch Road suite 400, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

UW Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad165.

Abstract

The treatment of burn patients using amphetamines is challenging due hemodynamic liabilty and altered physiology. Wide variation exists in the operative timing for this patient population. We hypothesize that burn excision in patients admitted with amphetamine positivity is safe regardless of timing. Data from two verified burn centers between 2017 and 2022 with differing practice patterns in operative timing for amphetamine-positive patients. Center A obtains toxicology only on admission and proceeds with surgery based on hemodynamic status and operative urgency, whereas Center B sends daily toxicology until a negative test results. The primary outcome was the use of vasoactive agents during the index operation, modeled using logistic regression adjusting for burn severity and hospital days to index operation. Secondary outcomes included death and inpatient complications. A total of 270 patients were included, and there were no significant differences in demographics or burn characteristics between centers. Center A screened once and Center B obtained a median of four screens prior to the surgery. The adjusted OR of requiring vasoactive support intraoperatively was not associated with negative toxicology result (P = .821). Having a body surface area burned >20% conferred a significantly higher risk of vasoactive support (adj. OR 13.42 [3.90-46.23], P < .001). Mortality, number of operations, stroke, and hospital length of stay were similar between cohorts. Comparison between two verified burn centers indicates that waiting until a negative amphetamine toxicology result does not impact intraoperative management or subsequent burn outcomes. Serial toxicology tests are unnecessary to guide operative timing of burn patients with amphetamine use.

摘要

使用安非他命治疗烧伤患者具有挑战性,因为存在血液动力学风险和改变的生理学。该患者人群的手术时机存在广泛差异。我们假设,无论时机如何,对于安非他命阳性的烧伤患者,切除烧伤组织是安全的。本研究纳入了 2017 年至 2022 年期间两个经过验证的烧伤中心的数据,这两个中心在安非他命阳性患者的手术时机方面存在不同的实践模式。中心 A 仅在入院时进行毒理学检查,并根据血液动力学状态和手术紧急程度进行手术,而中心 B 则每天进行毒理学检查,直到检测结果为阴性。主要结局是在指数手术期间使用血管活性药物,使用逻辑回归模型进行调整,以调整烧伤严重程度和到指数手术的住院天数。次要结局包括死亡和住院并发症。共纳入 270 例患者,两个中心之间在人口统计学或烧伤特征方面无显著差异。中心 A 筛查一次,中心 B 在手术前获得了中位数为 4 次的筛查结果。术中需要血管活性支持的调整比值比与阴性毒理学结果无关(P=.821)。烧伤面积>20%的患者需要血管活性支持的风险显著更高(调整比值比 13.42[3.90-46.23],P<.001)。死亡率、手术次数、中风和住院时间在两组之间相似。对两个经过验证的烧伤中心的比较表明,等待安非他命毒理学检查结果为阴性并不影响术中管理或随后的烧伤结局。对使用安非他命的烧伤患者进行连续毒理学检查以指导手术时机是没有必要的。

相似文献

1
Amphetamine Positivity Prior to Burn Surgery Does not Adversely Affect Intraoperative Outcomes.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad165.
2
Clinical and Socioeconomic Differences in Methamphetamine-Positive Burn Patients.
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Oct 16;40(6):734-742. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz102.
3
Inpatient Complications and Outcomes for Burn Patients Admitted With Methamphetamine Intoxication.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Aug 6;45(4):1026-1031. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae014.
4
Effect of primary admission to burn centers on the outcomes of severely burned patients.
Burns. 2018 May;44(3):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
5
[Analysis of the clinical characteristics and risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients with critical burns].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 May 20;38(5):408-414. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220214-00026.
6
Methamphetamine-associated burn injuries: a retrospective analysis.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004 Sep-Oct;25(5):425-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000138298.30449.aa.
8
Accelerant-related burns and drug abuse: Challenging combination.
Burns. 2018 May;44(3):646-650. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.10.010.
9
The status quo of early burn wound excision: Insights from the German burn registry.
Burns. 2021 Sep;47(6):1259-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
10
Operative utilization following severe combat-related burns.
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):287-96. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000132.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Elevated Blood Alcohol Levels on Burn Patient Outcomes.
Eplasty. 2021 Nov 29;21:e8. eCollection 2021.
2
Hemodynamic Effects of Methamphetamine and General Anesthesia.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 17;2022:7542311. doi: 10.1155/2022/7542311. eCollection 2022.
3
Are Intoxicated Trauma Patients at an Increased Risk for Intraoperative Anesthetic Complications? A Retrospective Study.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020 Mar 1;2020:2157295. doi: 10.1155/2020/2157295. eCollection 2020.
4
Surgical options in extensive burns management.
J Med Life. 2012 Oct-Dec;5(Spec Issue):129-136.
5
A Mechanistic and Pathophysiological Approach for Stroke Associated with Drugs of Abuse.
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 23;8(9):1295. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091295.
6
Time to start putting down the knife: A systematic review of burns excision tools of randomised and non-randomised trials.
Burns. 2018 Nov;44(7):1721-1737. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
The Effect of Illicit Drug Use on Outcomes Following Burn Injury.
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e89-e94. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000407.
9
Variations in Burn Excision and Grafting: A Survey of the American Burn Association.
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e125-e132. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000475.
10
ISBI Practice Guidelines for Burn Care.
Burns. 2016 Aug;42(5):953-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验