Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL (Drs Keenan-Devlin and Freedman, Ms Smart, and Dr Borders); University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Dr Ernst and Drs Keenan-Devlin, Freedman, and Dr Borders).
Institute for Policy Research and Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (Dr Miller).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Dec;5(12):101200. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101200. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in preterm birth and small for gestational age births are growing in the United States, increasing the burden of morbidity and mortality particularly among Black women and birthing persons and their infants. Group prenatal care is one of the only interventions to show potential to reduce the disparity, but the mechanism is unclear.
The goal of this project was to identify if group prenatal care, when compared with individual prenatal care, was associated with a reduction in systemic inflammation during pregnancy and a lower prevalence of inflammatory lesions in the placenta at delivery.
The Psychosocial Intervention and Inflammation in Centering Study was a prospective cohort study that exclusively enrolled participants from a large randomized controlled trial of group prenatal care (the Cradle study, R01HD082311, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02640638) that was performed at a single site in Greenville, South Carolina, from 2016 to 2020. In the Cradle study, patients were randomized to either group prenatal care or individual prenatal care, and survey data were collected during the second and third trimesters. The Psychosocial Intervention and Inflammation in Centering Study cohort additionally provided serum samples at these 2 survey time points and permitted collection of placental biopsies for inflammatory and histologic analysis, respectively. We examined associations between group prenatal care treatment and a composite of z scored serum inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor α) in both the second and third trimesters and the association with the prevalence of acute and chronic maternal placental inflammatory lesions. Analyses were conducted using the intent to treat principle, and the results were also examined by attendance of visits in the assigned treatment group (modified intent to treat and median or more number of visits) and were stratified by race and ethnicity.
A total of 1256 of 1375 (92%) Cradle participants who were approached enrolled in the Psychosocial Intervention and Inflammation in Centering Study, which included 54% of all the Cradle participants. The Psychosocial Intervention and Inflammation in Centering Study cohort did not differ from the Cradle cohort by demographic or clinical characteristics. Among the 1256 Psychosocial Intervention and Inflammation in Centering Study participants, 1133 (89.6%) had placental data available for analysis. Among those, 549 were assigned to group prenatal care and 584 of 1133 were assigned to individual prenatal care. In the intent to treat and modified intent to treat cohorts, participation in group prenatal care was associated with a higher serum inflammatory score, but it was not associated with an increased prevalence of placental inflammatory lesions. In the stratified analyses, group prenatal care was associated with a higher second trimester inflammatory biomarker composite (modified intent to treat: B=1.17; P=.02; and median or more visits: B=1.24; P=.05) among Hispanic or Latine participants.
Unexpectedly, group prenatal care was associated with higher maternal serum inflammation during pregnancy, especially among Hispanic or Latine participants.
在美国,早产儿和小于胎龄儿的比例在不同种族和社会经济群体之间的差距不断扩大,这增加了发病率和死亡率的负担,尤其是在黑人和分娩女性及其婴儿中。群体产前护理是唯一显示出有潜力减少这种差异的干预措施之一,但具体机制尚不清楚。
本项目的目标是确定群体产前护理与个体产前护理相比,是否与孕期系统性炎症的减少以及分娩时胎盘炎症病变的发生率降低有关。
心理社会干预和中心研究中的炎症是一项前瞻性队列研究,仅纳入了来自南卡罗来纳州格林维尔的一项大型群体产前护理随机对照试验(Cradle 研究,R01HD082311,ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02640638)的参与者,该研究于 2016 年至 2020 年在该地点进行。在 Cradle 研究中,患者被随机分配到群体产前护理或个体产前护理组,并且在第二和第三个三个月收集调查数据。中心研究中的心理社会干预和炎症队列还在这两个调查时间点提供了血清样本,并分别允许采集胎盘活检进行炎症和组织学分析。我们检查了群体产前护理治疗与第二和第三个三个月的 z 评分血清炎症生物标志物(C 反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-1 受体拮抗剂、白细胞介素-10 和肿瘤坏死因子-α)综合指标之间的关联,以及与急性和慢性母体胎盘炎症病变的发生率之间的关联。分析采用意向治疗原则进行,结果还根据在指定治疗组中就诊的次数(改良意向治疗和中位数或更多就诊次数)进行了检查,并按种族和民族进行了分层。
在 1375 名 Cradle 参与者中,共有 1256 名(92%)接受了心理社会干预和中心研究中的炎症,其中包括所有 Cradle 参与者的 54%。中心研究中的心理社会干预和炎症队列在人口统计学和临床特征方面与 Cradle 队列没有差异。在 1256 名中心研究中的心理社会干预和炎症参与者中,有 1133 名(89.6%)有可用的胎盘数据进行分析。其中,549 名被分配到群体产前护理组,1133 名中的 584 名被分配到个体产前护理组。在意向治疗和改良意向治疗队列中,群体产前护理与更高的血清炎症评分相关,但与胎盘炎症病变的发生率增加无关。在分层分析中,群体产前护理与第二孕期炎症生物标志物综合指标较高相关(改良意向治疗:B=1.17;P=.02;中位数或更多就诊:B=1.24;P=.05),在西班牙裔或拉丁裔参与者中。
出乎意料的是,群体产前护理与孕期母体血清炎症水平升高有关,尤其是在西班牙裔或拉丁裔参与者中。