University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, OK, USA.
University of Oklahoma, Anne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, Norman, OK, USA.
Perm J. 2023 Dec 15;27(4):72-81. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.159. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have profound implications for adult health. Health care practitioners need effective communication tools for trauma-sensitive inquiries with patients. This study aimed to describe characteristics of effective metaphor use by health care trainees when discussing ACEs and health with adult patients, and to provide example metaphors for clinicians to use to sensitively address ACEs.
Trainees engaged in a videorecorded simulation as part of a model to teach health care practitioners communication skills related to ACEs. Videos were identified in which the trainee used a metaphor to help explain ACEs during the encounter. Encounter segments that used metaphors were transcribed and metaphor type, duration, and recurrence were coded using a standardized rubric. Each metaphor was scored for effectiveness and basic statistical analysis was conducted.
Of the 122 videos reviewed, 24 types of metaphors were used, with the most common being the overloaded backpack (n = 24). Mean metaphor duration was 37 s (SD = 24 s). Metaphors rated as effective were shorter and less variable in duration (31.8 s, SD = 14.7 s) than those rated as ineffective (39 s, SD = 34 s). No one metaphor performed significantly better and most of the metaphors were evaluated as being adequate or effective.
Literary devices like metaphors may be efficient and effective explanatory tools to improve clinician communication skills and patient understanding in addressing sensitive topics, such as ACEs. Minimal time investment is required to employ metaphors in ACEs discussions. The authors found no single metaphor that to be clearly superior, indicating that patient-centered metaphor use may improve communication between clinicians and patients who experienced childhood trauma.
童年逆境经历(ACEs)对成年人的健康有深远的影响。医疗保健从业者需要有效的沟通工具,以便与患者进行创伤敏感的询问。本研究旨在描述医疗保健受训者在与成年患者讨论 ACEs 和健康时有效使用隐喻的特征,并为临床医生提供使用隐喻来敏感地解决 ACEs 的示例。
受训者作为教授医疗保健从业者与 ACEs 相关的沟通技巧的模型的一部分,参与了录像模拟。确定了受训者在遭遇中使用隐喻来帮助解释 ACEs 的视频。使用标准化的评分表对包含隐喻的遭遇片段进行转录,并对隐喻类型、时长和重复出现进行编码。对每个隐喻的有效性进行评分,并进行基本的统计分析。
在审查的 122 个视频中,使用了 24 种隐喻,其中最常见的是过载背包(n = 24)。隐喻的平均持续时间为 37 秒(SD = 24 秒)。被评为有效的隐喻持续时间更短,变化幅度更小(31.8 秒,SD = 14.7 秒),而被评为无效的隐喻持续时间更长(39 秒,SD = 34 秒)。没有一种隐喻表现出明显的优势,大多数隐喻被评估为适当或有效。
文学手法,如隐喻,可能是一种有效且高效的解释工具,可提高临床医生的沟通技巧,并帮助患者更好地理解敏感话题,如 ACEs。在 ACEs 讨论中使用隐喻只需很少的时间投入。作者没有发现任何一种隐喻明显更优越,这表明以患者为中心的隐喻使用可能会改善经历过童年创伤的临床医生和患者之间的沟通。