Suppr超能文献

话语目标影响名词隐喻生成的过程和结果。

Discourse Goals Affect the Process and Product of Nominal Metaphor Production.

作者信息

Utsumi Akira, Sakamoto Maki

机构信息

Department of Informatics, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofushi, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan,

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Oct;44(5):555-69. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9305-7.

Abstract

Although a large number of studies have addressed metaphor comprehension, only a few attempts have so far been made at exploring the process of metaphor production. Therefore, in this paper, we address the problem of how people generate nominal metaphors or identify an apt vehicle for a given topic of nominal metaphors. Specifically, we examine how the process and product of metaphor production differ between two discourse goals of metaphor, namely an explanatory purpose (e.g., to clarify) and a literary purpose (e.g., to aesthetically pleasing). Experiment 1 analyzed the metaphors (or vehicles) generated in the metaphor production task, and demonstrated that people identified more prototypical exemplars of the property to be attributed to the topic as a vehicle for explanatory metaphors than for literary metaphors. In addition, it was found that metaphors generated for the explanatory purpose were more apt and conventional, and had high topic-vehicle similarity than those generated for the literary purpose, while metaphors generated for the literary purpose were more familiar and imageable than those for the explanatory purpose. Experiment 2 used a priming paradigm to assess the online availability of prototypical and less prototypical members of the topic property during metaphor production. The result was that both prototypical and less prototypical members were activated in producing literary metaphors, while neither members were activated in the production of explanatory metaphors. These findings indicate that the process of metaphor production is affected by discourse goals of metaphor; less prototypical members of the category are searched for a vehicle during the production of literary metaphors, and thus literary metaphors are generated with less prototypical vehicles than explanatory metaphors.

摘要

尽管大量研究探讨了隐喻理解,但迄今为止,在探索隐喻生成过程方面的尝试却很少。因此,在本文中,我们探讨了人们如何生成名词性隐喻或为给定的名词性隐喻主题确定合适的喻体这一问题。具体而言,我们研究了隐喻生成过程和产物在隐喻的两种语篇目标(即解释目的,如澄清;和文学目的,如审美愉悦)之间是如何不同的。实验1分析了隐喻生成任务中生成的隐喻(或喻体),并证明与文学隐喻相比,人们在生成解释性隐喻时会将更多待赋予主题的属性的典型示例确定为喻体。此外,研究发现,为解释目的生成的隐喻比为文学目的生成的隐喻更恰当、更常规,且主题与喻体的相似度更高,而为文学目的生成的隐喻比为解释目的生成的隐喻更常见、更具形象性。实验2使用启动范式来评估隐喻生成过程中主题属性的典型和非典型成员在线可得性。结果表明,在生成文学隐喻时,典型和非典型成员都会被激活,而在生成解释性隐喻时,两类成员均未被激活。这些发现表明,隐喻生成过程受隐喻的语篇目标影响;在生成文学隐喻时,会寻找范畴中不太典型的成员作为喻体,因此与解释性隐喻相比,文学隐喻生成时使用的喻体原型性更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验