University of Gastronomic Sciences, Bra CN, Italy.
School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
J Food Sci. 2023 Dec;88(12):5203-5215. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16786. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
To date, few studies investigated the differences between the two main gluten-free (GF) brewing techniques, such as the use of enzymes and the use of unconventional GF grains in brewing, by consumer perspective. In this study a GF beer brewed with sorghum and quinoa, as brewing adjuncts, was compared to the enzymatic-treated counterpart, in order to evaluate the effect of deglutinization treatment on physicochemical, volatile, and sensory characteristics of final beer. Moreover, the influence of brewing process and raw materials information on consumers' sensory perceptions, willingness to buy (WTB) and willingness to pay (WTP) was also investigated (n = 105 consumers), under blind (B), expected (E), and informed (I) conditions. The enzymatic-treated sample showed comparable physicochemical attributes with the untreated counterpart, except for a significant reduction in color and foam stability (p < 0.05). Non-significant difference between samples was found in the overall liking, WTB, and WTP mean scores in all three sensory test conditions (p > 0.05). The information about the deglutinization treatment had a negative impact on overall liking (p < 0.01), although WTP for both samples was significantly higher in the informed test than in blind condition (p < 0.05). Overall, Check-All-That-Apply test results confirmed that the deglutinization treatment does not affect the beer sensory profile, even if the information about brewing ingredients and technologies may slightly influence the consumers' sensory perception. Therefore, this result proves that it is possible to produce a marketable GF beer, simply by partially replacing 40% of barley malt with unconventional GF grains, without using enzymes for gluten reduction purpose.
迄今为止,很少有研究从消费者的角度调查两种主要的无麸质(GF)酿造技术(如使用酶和使用非常规 GF 谷物酿造)之间的差异。在这项研究中,使用高粱和藜麦作为酿造辅料酿造的 GF 啤酒与经过酶处理的对应物进行了比较,以评估脱胶处理对最终啤酒的理化、挥发性和感官特性的影响。此外,还研究了酿造过程和原料信息对消费者感官感知、购买意愿(WTB)和支付意愿(WTP)的影响(n=105 名消费者),在盲测(B)、预期(E)和知情(I)条件下。与未处理的对照相比,经过酶处理的样品具有可比的理化特性,除了颜色和泡沫稳定性显著降低(p<0.05)。在所有三种感官测试条件下,样品的总体喜好、WTB 和 WTP 平均得分均无显著差异(p>0.05)。关于脱胶处理的信息对总体喜好有负面影响(p<0.01),尽管在知情测试中,两个样品的 WTP 都明显高于盲测条件(p<0.05)。总体而言,“多选一”测试结果证实,脱胶处理不会影响啤酒的感官特征,即使有关酿造成分和技术的信息可能会略微影响消费者的感官感知。因此,这一结果证明,只需用非常规的 GF 谷物替代 40%的大麦麦芽,就可以生产出有市场销售潜力的 GF 啤酒,而无需使用酶来降低麸质。