他达拉非作为非处方药的获益与风险证据:采用德尔菲法进行综述与评估以达成临床专家共识

Evidence for benefits and risks of tadalafil as a non-prescription medicine: review and evaluation using the Group Delphi technique to achieve consensus amongst clinical experts.

作者信息

Miller Kurt, May Uwe, Beecken Wolf-Dietrich, Hatzichristodoulou Georgios, Böhm Michael, Fink Stefan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Health Economics and Pharmacoeconomics, Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1254706. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1254706. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

An evidence-based consensus meeting was held with urologists, a pharmacist and a cardiologist to perform a structured benefit-risk analysis of reclassifying tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), to be available without prescription in Germany. As per the Brass process endorsed by regulatory authorities, an evidence-based Brass value tree was developed, which identified the incremental benefits and risks that should be considered above the safety and efficacy evidence required for prescription medicines. During the Group Delphi consensus meeting, the expert panel rated the likelihood and clinical impact of each benefit and risk on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (high). Overall attribute scores were calculated from the product of the mean likelihood and mean clinical impact scores giving a possible score of 0-9. The overall benefit attribute scores ranged from 2.8 to 5.4. The overall risk attribute scores ranged from 0.2 to 2.2 though most were 1.0 or less (3 or more is generally considered to be of concern). On balance, the independent meeting scored the benefits of reclassification of tadalafil higher than the risks and considered the risk mitigation strategies of the packaging label and patient information leaflet (PIL) sufficient.

摘要

与泌尿科医生、一名药剂师和一名心脏病专家举行了一次基于证据的共识会议,以对他达拉非(一种用于治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的5型磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂)在德国无需处方即可获得进行结构化的获益-风险分析。根据监管机构认可的布拉斯流程,制定了一个基于证据的布拉斯价值树,该价值树确定了在处方药所需的安全性和有效性证据之上应考虑的增量获益和风险。在德尔菲小组共识会议期间,专家小组对每项获益和风险的可能性及临床影响按0(无)至3(高)的等级进行评分。总体属性得分由平均可能性得分与平均临床影响得分的乘积计算得出,可能得分为0至9分。总体获益属性得分在2.8至5.4之间。总体风险属性得分在0.2至2.2之间,不过大多数为1.0或更低(一般认为3或更高值得关注)。总体而言,此次独立会议对他达拉非重新分类的获益评分高于风险,并认为包装标签和患者信息单页(PIL)的风险缓解策略足够。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/10590875/ab1f994c606a/fphar-14-1254706-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索