Vance David E, Collette Christopher, Frank Jennifer Sandson, Billings Rebecca, Deaver Jill, Del Bene Victor A, Fazeli Pariya L, Bail Jennifer R, Li Wei, Triebel Kristen, Von Ah Diane, Wang Hsiao-Lan
School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Oct 25:1-15. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2270097.
Subjective and objective cognitive impairments in Breast Cancer Survivors (BCS) often do not correlate. One important contribution to the reported disparities may be the reliance on mean-based cognitive performance. Cognitive intra-individual variability (IIV) may provide important insights into these reported disparities. Cognitive IIV refers to the fluctuation in performance for an individual on either one cognitive task across a trial or dispersed across tasks within a neuropsychological test battery. The purpose of this systematic review was to search for and examine the literature on cognitive IIV in BCS. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) approach was used to search for all articles related to cognitive IIV in BCS. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and Scopus databases were searched using detailed search terms and strategies. Initially, 164 articles were retrieved but only 4 articles met the criteria for this systematic review. BCS differed from healthy controls in similar ways across the four studies, generally demonstrating similar performance but showing increased cognitive IIV for the more difficult tasks. Differences were enhanced later during chemotherapy. The four studies provide support for cognitive IIV as a useful measure to detect the subtle objective cognitive change often reported by BCS but frequently not detected by standard normed-based cognitive testing. Unexpectedly, measures of cognitive IIV were not consistently associated with self-reported measures of cognition.
乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)的主观认知障碍和客观认知障碍往往并不相关。报告中出现的差异的一个重要原因可能是对基于均值的认知表现的依赖。认知个体内变异性(IIV)可能为这些报告中的差异提供重要见解。认知IIV是指个体在一项认知任务的一次试验中或在神经心理测试组中的不同任务之间表现的波动。本系统评价的目的是检索和审查关于BCS认知IIV的文献。采用PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)方法检索所有与BCS认知IIV相关的文章。使用详细的检索词和策略检索MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Embase和Scopus数据库。最初检索到164篇文章,但只有4篇文章符合本系统评价的标准。在四项研究中,BCS与健康对照在相似方面存在差异,总体表现相似,但在较难的任务中表现出更高的认知IIV。化疗后期差异更加明显。这四项研究支持将认知IIV作为一种有用的测量方法,以检测BCS经常报告但标准的基于常模的认知测试经常未检测到的细微客观认知变化。出乎意料的是,认知IIV的测量结果与自我报告的认知测量结果并不一致相关。