Suppr超能文献

光学相干断层成像术或血管内超声引导下的复杂冠状动脉病变介入治疗。

Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 23;83(3):401-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions.

METHODS

This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079).

摘要

背景

光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和血管内超声(IVUS)在指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)方面显示出可比的结果。然而,它们在复杂冠状动脉病变中的比较效果仍不清楚。

目的

本研究比较了 OCT 指导与 IVUS 指导的 PCI 在复杂冠状动脉病变中的效果和安全性。

方法

这是 OCTIVUS 试验中复杂冠状动脉病变的预设主要亚组分析,其中包括无保护左主干病变、分叉病变、主动脉-开口病变、慢性完全闭塞、严重钙化病变、支架内再狭窄病变、弥漫性长病变或多血管 PCI。主要终点是由心脏原因引起的死亡、靶血管相关心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建的复合事件。

结果

在 2008 例随机患者中,1475 例(73.5%)接受了复杂冠状动脉病变的成像引导 PCI;719 例(48.7%)接受了 OCT 引导 PCI,756 例(51.3%)接受了 IVUS 引导 PCI。在中位随访 2.0 年时,OCT 引导组中有 47 例(6.5%)和 IVUS 引导组中有 56 例(7.4%)发生了主要终点事件(HR:0.87;95%CI:0.59-1.29;P=0.50)。这些发现在调整后的分析中是一致的。两组之间造影剂肾病的发生率相似(1.9%比 1.5%;P=0.46)。OCT 引导组的主要手术并发症发生率低于 IVUS 引导组(1.7%比 3.4%;P=0.03)。

结论

在复杂冠状动脉病变患者中,与 IVUS 指导的 PCI 相比,OCT 指导的 PCI 主要复合终点(由心脏原因引起的死亡、靶血管相关心肌梗死或靶血管血运重建)的风险相似。(光学相干断层扫描与血管内超声引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗[OCTIVUS];NCT03394079)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验