• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于病因的院外心脏骤停后体外心肺复苏患者预后:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。

Etiology-Based Prognosis of Extracorporeal CPR Recipients After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Healthcare Information Management, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Chest. 2024 Apr;165(4):858-869. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.022. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.022
PMID:37879561
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the relative contributions of various factors to patient outcomes is essential for optimal patient selection for extracorporeal CPR (ECPR) therapy for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, evidence on the prognostic comparison based on the etiologies of cardiac arrest is limited.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the etiology-based prognosis of patients undergoing ECPR for OHCA?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter registry study involved 36 institutions in Japan and included all adult patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR between January 2013 and December 2018. The primary etiology for OHCA was determined retrospectively from all hospital-based data at each institution. We performed a multivariable logistic regression model to determine the association between etiology of cardiac arrest and two outcomes: favorable neurologic outcome and survival at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

We identified 1,781 eligible patients, of whom 1,405 (78.9%) had cardiac arrest because of cardiac causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for favorable neurologic outcome showed that accidental hypothermia (adjusted OR, 5.12; 95% CI, 2.98-8.80; P < .001) was associated with a significantly higher rate of favorable neurologic outcome than cardiac causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for survival showed that accidental hypothermia (adjusted OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 3.15-8.56; P < .001) had significantly higher rates of survival than cardiac causes. Acute aortic dissection/aneurysm (adjusted OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.28; P < .001) and primary cerebral disorders (adjusted OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.50; P = .004) had significantly lower rates of survival than cardiac causes.

INTERPRETATION

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, although most patients with OHCA underwent ECPR for cardiac causes, accidental hypothermia was associated with favorable neurologic outcome and survival; in contrast, acute aortic dissection/aneurysm and primary cerebral disorders were associated with nonsurvival compared with cardiac causes.

摘要

背景

为了优化体外心肺复苏(ECPR)治疗院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的患者选择,更好地了解各种因素对患者结局的相对贡献至关重要。然而,基于心脏骤停病因的预后比较证据有限。

研究问题

接受 ECPR 治疗 OHCA 的患者的病因预后如何?

研究设计和方法

这是一项回顾性多中心登记研究,涉及日本的 36 家机构,纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受 ECPR 的所有成年 OHCA 患者。每个机构均从所有基于医院的数据中回顾性确定 OHCA 的主要病因。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定心脏骤停病因与两种结局之间的关系:神经功能良好和出院时存活。

结果

我们确定了 1781 名符合条件的患者,其中 1405 名(78.9%)因心脏原因发生心脏骤停。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,意外低温(调整后的优势比,5.12;95%CI,2.98-8.80;P<0.001)与神经功能良好的发生率显著高于心脏原因。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,意外低温(调整后的优势比,5.19;95%CI,3.15-8.56;P<0.001)的存活率显著高于心脏原因。急性主动脉夹层/动脉瘤(调整后的优势比,0.07;95%CI,0.02-0.28;P<0.001)和原发性脑疾病(调整后的优势比,0.12;95%CI,0.03-0.50;P=0.004)的存活率显著低于心脏原因。

解释

在这项回顾性多中心队列研究中,尽管大多数 OHCA 患者因心脏原因接受 ECPR,但意外低温与神经功能良好和存活相关;相反,急性主动脉夹层/动脉瘤和原发性脑疾病与心脏原因相比与非存活相关。

相似文献

1
Etiology-Based Prognosis of Extracorporeal CPR Recipients After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.基于病因的院外心脏骤停后体外心肺复苏患者预后:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Chest. 2024 Apr;165(4):858-869. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.022. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
Sub-phenotypes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who undergo extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry.接受体外心肺复苏的院外心脏骤停患者的亚表型:一项来自多中心注册研究的回顾性观察研究。
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 22;29(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05575-5.
3
Association of advanced age and aetiology of cardiac arrest with outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a secondary analysis of multicentre registry study in Japan.高龄及心脏骤停病因与接受体外心肺复苏的院外心脏骤停患者预后的关联:日本多中心注册研究的二次分析
Emerg Med J. 2025 Jul 22;42(8):526-533. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213510.
4
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
5
Waveform conversion as a prognostic factor of poor prognosis in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.波形转换作为体外心肺复苏患者预后不良的一个预后因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;93:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.041. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
6
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.体外心肺复苏治疗难治性院外心脏骤停:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Oct;18(7):2113-2120. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03357-x. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
Bystander CPR Technique and Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest With and Without Opioid Toxicity.旁观者心肺复苏术对伴有和不伴有阿片类药物中毒的心脏骤停的技术及效果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516340. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16340.
8
Neurologic outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation assisted CPR for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review.体外膜肺氧合辅助心肺复苏治疗院外心脏骤停患者的神经预后:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:146-158. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
9
Extracorporeal and Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Low-Flow Duration: Insights From a Nationwide Hospital-Based Registry Study in Japan (JAAM-OHCA Registry).体外与传统心肺复苏及低流量持续时间:来自日本一项基于全国医院登记研究(JAAM-OHCA登记研究)的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):e039938. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039938. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
10
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时心肺复苏(CPR)加延迟除颤与立即除颤的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 12;2014(9):CD009803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009803.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological outcome predictors after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review.体外心肺复苏后的神经学预后预测因素:一项系统评价
Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 22;14(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02818-y.