Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Anna Jaques Hospital, Newburyport, Massachusetts.
J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;65(6):e568-e579. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
Incidental finding (IF) follow-up is of critical importance for patient safety and is a source of malpractice risk. Laboratory, imaging, or other types of IFs are often uncovered incidentally and are missed, not addressed, or only result after hospital discharge. Despite a growing IF notification literature, a need remains to study cost-effective non-electronic health record (EHR)-specific solutions that can be used across different types of IFs and EHRs.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility and cost-effectiveness of an EHR-independent emergency medicine-based quality assurance (QA) follow-up program in which an experienced nurse reviewed laboratory and imaging studies and ensured appropriate follow-up of results.
A QA nurse reviewed preceding-day abnormal studies from a tertiary care hospital, a community hospital, and an urgent care center. Laboratory values outside preset parameters or radiology over-reads resulting in clinically actionable changes triggered contact with an on-call emergency physician to determine an appropriate intervention and its implementation.
Of 104,125 visits with 1,351,212 laboratory studies and 95,000 imaging studies, 6530 visits had IFs, including 2659 laboratory and 4004 imaging results. The most common intervention was contacting a primary care physician (5783 cases [88.6%]). Twenty-one cases resulted in a patient returning to the ED, at an average cost of $28,000 per potential life-/limb-saving intervention.
Although abnormalities in laboratory results and imaging are often incidental to patient care, a dedicated emergency department QA follow-up program resulted in the identification and communication of numerous laboratory and imaging abnormalities and may result in changes to patients' subsequent clinical course, potentially increasing patient safety.
偶然发现(IF)的随访对于患者安全至关重要,也是医疗事故风险的一个来源。实验室、影像或其他类型的 IF 通常是偶然发现的,并且会被遗漏、未得到处理,或者仅在出院后才发现。尽管关于 IF 通知的文献越来越多,但仍需要研究具有成本效益的非电子健康记录(EHR)特定解决方案,这些解决方案可以应用于不同类型的 IF 和 EHR。
本研究的目的是评估一种基于急诊医学的 EHR 独立质量保证(QA)随访方案的实用性和成本效益,该方案由一名经验丰富的护士审查实验室和影像研究,并确保对结果进行适当的随访。
QA 护士审查了一家三级保健医院、一家社区医院和一家紧急护理中心前一天的异常研究。超出预设参数的实验室值或放射学重读导致有临床可操作的改变,触发与值班急诊医生联系,以确定适当的干预措施及其实施。
在 104125 次就诊中,有 1351212 项实验室检查和 95000 项影像学检查,有 6530 次就诊有 IF,包括 2659 项实验室和 4004 项影像学结果。最常见的干预措施是联系初级保健医生(5783 例[88.6%])。21 例患者返回急诊科,潜在的生命/肢体挽救干预的平均成本为 28000 美元。
尽管实验室结果和影像学的异常通常与患者的护理无关,但专门的急诊 QA 随访方案可识别和沟通大量的实验室和影像学异常,并可能改变患者的后续临床过程,从而提高患者的安全性。