Suppr超能文献

南非伤害死亡分类错误的进一步证据:何时才能消除伤害死亡统计数据不准确的障碍?

Further evidence of misclassification of the injury deaths in South Africa: When will the barriers to accurate injury death statistics be removed?

机构信息

Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Department of Health and Wellness, Western Cape Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 4;113(9):30-35. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i9.836.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contrary to the World Health Organization's internationally recommended medical certificate of cause of death, the South African (SA) death notification form (DNF) does not allow for the reporting of the manner of death to permit accurate coding of external causes of injury deaths.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the injury cause-of-death profile from forensic pathology records collected for the National Cause-of-Death Validation (NCoDV) Project and compare it with profiles from other sources of injury mortality data. In particular, the recording of firearm use in homicides is compared between sources.

METHODS

The NCoDV Project was a cross-sectional study of deaths that occurred during a fixed period in 2017 and 2018, from a nationally representative sample of 27 health subdistricts in SA. Trained fieldworkers scanned forensic records for all deaths investigated at the forensic mortuaries serving the sampled subdistricts during the study period. Forensic practitioners reviewed the records and completed a medical certificate of cause of death for each decedent. Causes of death were coded to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), using Iris automated coding software. Cause-specific mortality fractions for injury deaths were compared with Injury Mortality Survey 2017 (IMS 2017) and Statistics South Africa 2017 (Stats SA 2017) datasets. The cause profile for all firearm-related deaths was compared between the three datasets.

RESULTS

A total of 5 315 records were available for analysis. Males accounted for 77.6% of cases, and most decedents were aged between 25 and 44 years. Homicide was the leading cause of death (34.7%), followed by transport injuries (32.6%) and suicide (14.7%). This injury cause profile was similar to IMS 2017 but differed markedly from the official statistics, which showed markedly lower proportions of these three causes (15.0%, 11.6% and 0.7%, respectively), and a much higher proportion of other unintentional causes. Investigation of firearm-related deaths revealed that most were homicides in NCoDV 2017/18 (88.5%) and IMS 2017 (93.1%), while in the Stats SA 2017 data, 98.7% of firearm deaths were classified as accidental. Approximately 7% of firearm-related deaths were suicides in NCoDV 2017/18 and IMS 2017, with only 0.3% in Stats SA 2017.

CONCLUSION

The official cause-of-death data for injuries in SA in 2017 differed substantially from findings from the NCoDV 2017/18 study and IMS 2017. Accurate data sources would ensure that public health interventions are designed to reduce the high injury burden. Inclusion of the manner of death on the DNF, as is recommended internationally, is critically important to enable more accurate, reliable and valid reporting of the injury profile.

摘要

背景

与世界卫生组织(WHO)国际推荐的死亡原因医学证明相反,南非(SA)死亡通知表(DNF)不允许报告死因,从而无法准确编码伤害死亡的外部原因。

目的

描述法医病理学记录中因伤害导致的死亡情况,这些记录是为国家死因验证(NCoDV)项目收集的,并将其与其他伤害死亡率数据来源进行比较。特别是,比较了不同来源在记录凶杀案中枪支使用情况方面的差异。

方法

NCoDV 项目是一项 2017 年和 2018 年期间发生的死亡的横断面研究,来自南非 27 个卫生分区的全国代表性样本。经过培训的现场工作人员对研究期间在法医太平间调查的所有死亡案例的法医记录进行了扫描。法医从业者审查了记录,并为每位死者填写了一份死亡原因医学证明。使用 Iris 自动编码软件将死因编码为国际疾病分类,第 10 版(ICD-10)。比较了伤害死亡的特定病因死亡率分数与 2017 年伤害死亡率调查(IMS 2017)和南非统计局 2017 年(Stats SA 2017)数据集。比较了三个数据集之间所有与枪支有关的死亡原因概况。

结果

共分析了 5315 份记录。男性占病例的 77.6%,大多数死者年龄在 25 至 44 岁之间。凶杀是导致死亡的主要原因(34.7%),其次是交通伤害(32.6%)和自杀(14.7%)。这种伤害原因概况与 IMS 2017 相似,但与官方统计数据明显不同,后者显示这三个原因的比例明显较低(分别为 15.0%、11.6%和 0.7%),而其他非故意原因的比例则高得多。对枪支相关死亡的调查显示,NCoDV 2017/18 年和 IMS 2017 中大多数枪支相关死亡是凶杀案(88.5%和 93.1%),而在 Stats SA 2017 数据中,98.7%的枪支死亡被归类为意外。NCoDV 2017/18 年和 IMS 2017 中约有 7%的枪支相关死亡是自杀,而 Stats SA 2017 中只有 0.3%。

结论

2017 年南非官方伤害死因数据与 NCoDV 2017/18 研究和 IMS 2017 的调查结果存在显著差异。准确的数据源将确保设计公共卫生干预措施以减少高伤害负担。按照国际建议在 DNF 上列入死因方式对于更准确、可靠和有效地报告伤害概况至关重要。

相似文献

3
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 32 States, 2016.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Oct 4;68(9):1-36. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss.6809a1.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 27 States, 2015.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Sep 28;67(11):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6711a1.
9
Surveillance for Violent Deaths -
National Violent Death Reporting System, 18 States, 2014.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Feb 2;67(2):1-36. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6702a1.
10
Injury mortality in South Africa: a 2009 and 2017 comparison to track progress to meeting sustainable development goal targets.
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2377828. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2377828. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the potential of introducing an electronic death registration system in South Africa.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 30;22(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01275-8.
2
Injury mortality in South Africa: a 2009 and 2017 comparison to track progress to meeting sustainable development goal targets.
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2377828. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2377828. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Suicide and self-harm in low- and middle- income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;2(6):e0000282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000282. eCollection 2022.
2
ANACONDA: a new tool to improve mortality and cause of death data.
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 9;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01521-0.
4
Where have all the gun deaths gone?
S Afr Med J. 2016 May 19;106(6). doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i6.10379.
6
The high burden of injuries in South Africa.
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Sep;85(9):695-702. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.037184.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验