Department of Haematology, Nîmes University Hospital and University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
UMR UA11 INSERM - Montpellier University IDESP, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293356. eCollection 2023.
In routine hematological instruments, blood cells are counted and sized by monitoring the impedance signals induced during their passage through a Coulter orifice. However, only signals associated with centered paths in the aperture are considered for analysis, while the rejected measurements, caused by near-wall trajectories, can provide additional information on red blood cells (RBC), as recent publications suggest. To assess usefulness of two new parameters in describing alterations in RBC properties, we performed a pilot study to compare blood samples from patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), frequent pathological condition associated with impairment in RBC deformability, versus controls. A total of 345 blood samples were analyzed: 225 in the DM group and 120 in the control group. A diagram of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], the two new parameters derived from the analysis of impedancemetry pulses, was used to compare distribution of RBC subpopulations between groups. To discriminate RBC from DM and control individuals, based on our multiparametric analysis, we built a score from variables derived from [Formula: see text] matrix which showed good performances: area under the receiving operating characteristic curve 0.948 (0.920-0.970), p<0.0001; best discriminating value: negative predictive value 94.7%, positive predictive value was 78.4%. These results seem promising to approach RBC alterations in routine laboratory practice. The related potential clinically relevant outcomes remain to be investigated.
在常规血液仪器中,通过监测细胞通过库尔特小孔时产生的阻抗信号来对细胞进行计数和大小分类。然而,只有与孔径中心路径相关的信号才会被用于分析,而被拒绝的测量结果,也就是由近壁轨迹引起的测量结果,可以提供有关红细胞(RBC)的额外信息,正如最近的出版物所表明的那样。为了评估两个新参数在描述 RBC 特性改变方面的有用性,我们进行了一项初步研究,比较了来自糖尿病(DM)患者和经常出现病理情况的患者的血液样本,这些病理情况与 RBC 变形能力受损有关,与对照组进行了比较。共分析了 345 个血液样本:DM 组 225 个,对照组 120 个。使用两个新参数[公式:见文本]和[公式:见文本]的示意图,这些参数是从阻抗测量脉冲分析中得出的,用于比较两组 RBC 亚群的分布。为了根据我们的多参数分析区分 DM 和对照组的 RBC,我们从[公式:见文本]矩阵中得出的变量构建了一个分数,该分数表现出良好的性能:接受者操作特征曲线下的面积为 0.948(0.920-0.970),p<0.0001;最佳区分值:阴性预测值为 94.7%,阳性预测值为 78.4%。这些结果似乎有望在常规实验室实践中研究 RBC 的改变。相关的潜在临床相关结果仍有待研究。