Suppr超能文献

优化苔藓和地衣移植作为空气中人为微纤维的生物监测器

Optimizing Moss and Lichen Transplants as Biomonitors of Airborne Anthropogenic Microfibers.

作者信息

Capozzi Fiore, Sorrentino Maria Cristina, Granata Angelo, Vergara Alessandro, Alberico Miriam, Rossi Manuela, Spagnuolo Valeria, Giordano Simonetta

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Napoli, Italy.

Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Napoli, Italy.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;12(10):1278. doi: 10.3390/biology12101278.

Abstract

Anthropogenic microfibers (mfs) are synthetic particles composed of cellulose (cotton, rayon, acetate, etc.) or petrochemical-based polymers (i.e., microplastics-MPs) that are less than 5 mm in length. The accumulation of mfs, including MPs, in the moss and the lichen was compared in a transplant experiment lasting 6 weeks. We also tested the effects of the bag used for transplants on the accumulation of mfs. Anthropogenic particles trapped by both biomonitors were mostly filamentous (99% mfs), and their number was overall higher in the moss (mean ± s.d. 102 ± 24) than in the lichen (mean ± s.d. 87 ± 17), at parity of sample weight. On average, mfs found in lichen were significantly longer than those found in moss bags, suggesting that lichens are less efficient at retaining smaller mfs. Exposure without the net yielded a higher mfs number accumulation in both species, indicating that "naked" transplants provide greater sensitivity. The calculation of daily fluxes evidenced a loss of mfs in the lichen, suggesting the presence of more stable bonds between moss and mfs. Raman microspectroscopy carried out on about 100 debris confirms the anthropogenic nature of mfs, of which 20% were MPs. Overall results indicate that moss is preferable to lichen in the biomonitoring of airborne mfs especially when exposed naked.

摘要

人为微纤维(mfs)是由纤维素(棉、人造丝、醋酸纤维等)或石化基聚合物(即微塑料-MPs)组成的合成颗粒,其长度小于5毫米。在一项为期6周的移植实验中,比较了包括微塑料在内的微纤维在苔藓和地衣中的积累情况。我们还测试了用于移植的袋子对微纤维积累的影响。两种生物监测器捕获的人为颗粒大多是丝状的(99%为微纤维),在样本重量相同的情况下,苔藓中的颗粒数量总体上高于地衣(平均值±标准差为102±24),而地衣中的颗粒数量为(平均值±标准差为87±17)。平均而言,在地衣中发现的微纤维明显比在苔藓袋中发现的微纤维长,这表明地衣在保留较小微纤维方面效率较低。没有网的暴露使两个物种中的微纤维数量积累更高,这表明“裸”移植提供了更高的敏感性。每日通量的计算证明地衣中有微纤维损失,这表明苔藓和微纤维之间存在更稳定的结合。对大约100个碎片进行的拉曼显微光谱证实了微纤维的人为性质,其中20%是微塑料。总体结果表明,在空气传播微纤维的生物监测中,苔藓比地衣更可取,尤其是在裸暴露时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/770b/10604676/49654c8f4c61/biology-12-01278-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验