• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[接受外科瓣膜置换术和经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的延迟性认知障碍:一项比较研究]

[Delayed cognitive impairment in patients with aortic stenosis treated with surgical valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparative study].

作者信息

Díaz-Leiva J, Arrondo-Gómez P, Alonso-Sendín E, Gainza-Calleja A, Ostolaza-Ibáñez A, Tellechea-Aramburo P, Gómez-Blasco F, Blanco-Beregaña M, López-Sala P, Cabada-Giadás T

机构信息

Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, España.

Fundación Clínica Josefina Arregui, Alsasua, España.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2023 Nov 1;77(9):205-214. doi: 10.33588/rn.7709.2022346.

DOI:10.33588/rn.7709.2022346
PMID:37889128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831739/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment secondary to cerebrovascular events is a common complication of aortic valve replacement interventions. Our aim is to study the deterioration profile of patients who have undergone surgical valve replacement or transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI) and whether it differs according to the intervention they underwent and their baseline risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study with two non-equivalent groups of patients (TAVI group and surgical group) Intergroup comparisons were carried out in several cognitive domains, with a baseline assessment and follow-up measurements six and 12 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

The TAVI group performed less well than the surgical group in executive and visuospatial functions, with scores partially determined by age (p < 0.01) and prior intellectual level (Pearson prior intelligence quotient-scalar test means: 0.665; p < 0.001). Mean scores at the three measurement points indicate a decline in executive function performance at six months, which is restored at 12 months. Sustained increases in memory were recorded at both time points, while visuospatial function and naming showed no subsequent recovery of the baseline levels. These trends are similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained do not confirm the appearance of a specific process of post-intervention neurocognitive impairment in complicated aortic stenosis. The deterioration profile does not show any significant differences between groups, but is more evident in TAVI patients, due to the influence of variables related to sample selection.

摘要

引言

脑血管事件继发的认知障碍是主动脉瓣置换术干预的常见并发症。我们的目的是研究接受外科瓣膜置换或经导管瓣膜植入术(TAVI)的患者的恶化情况,以及其是否因所接受的干预措施及其基线风险因素而有所不同。

患者与方法

我们对两组不等同的患者(TAVI组和手术组)进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。在几个认知领域进行了组间比较,并在干预后6个月和12个月进行了基线评估和随访测量。

结果

TAVI组在执行功能和视觉空间功能方面的表现不如手术组,得分部分由年龄(p < 0.01)和先前的智力水平决定(皮尔逊先前智商-标量测试均值:0.665;p < 0.001)。三个测量点的平均得分表明,执行功能在6个月时下降,在12个月时恢复。在两个时间点均记录到记忆力持续增加,而视觉空间功能和命名能力未恢复到基线水平。两组的这些趋势相似。

结论

所获得的结果未证实复杂主动脉瓣狭窄患者干预后出现特定的神经认知障碍过程。恶化情况在两组之间没有显著差异,但由于与样本选择相关的变量的影响,在TAVI患者中更为明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/acbdce9aeabb/RN-77-205-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/b665c32a3f09/RN-77-205-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/b3ac60087aac/RN-77-205-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/c92b616178f2/RN-77-205-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/acbdce9aeabb/RN-77-205-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/b665c32a3f09/RN-77-205-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/b3ac60087aac/RN-77-205-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/c92b616178f2/RN-77-205-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a3/10831739/acbdce9aeabb/RN-77-205-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
[Delayed cognitive impairment in patients with aortic stenosis treated with surgical valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparative study].[接受外科瓣膜置换术和经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的延迟性认知障碍:一项比较研究]
Rev Neurol. 2023 Nov 1;77(9):205-214. doi: 10.33588/rn.7709.2022346.
2
Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在中危患者中的神经损伤比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):508-17. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0946-9. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.严重左心室收缩功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院结局的影响:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 多中心研究倾向匹配人群的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Factors influencing the choice between transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients younger than 80 years: Results from the OBSERVANT study.影响 80 岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与手术治疗选择的因素:来自 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):E186-E195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28447. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
6
[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review of the literature on efficacy and safety data].经导管主动脉瓣植入术:关于疗效和安全性数据的文献系统评价
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Jan;107(1):25-38. doi: 10.1701/2132.23102.
7
Minimalistic Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Open Vascular Vs. Fully Percutaneous Approach.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的极简方法:开放血管法与完全经皮法
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2019 Oct 1;40(2):5-14. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0009.
8
The impact of the development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on the management of severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients: treatment strategies and outcome.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的发展对高危患者严重主动脉瓣狭窄管理的影响:治疗策略与结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jan;51(1):80-88. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw211. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3143-3153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275.
10
Is the quality-of-life improvement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation equivalent to that achieved by surgical aortic valve replacement?经导管主动脉瓣植入术后生活质量的改善是否等同于外科主动脉瓣置换术所达到的改善?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Nov 22;33(6):866-870. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab186.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparametric Outcome Assessment After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-A Systematic Review.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的多参数结局评估——一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1426. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051426.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心脏瓣膜病管理指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 22;60(4):727-800. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab389.
2
Lower Cardiac Output Relates to Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Aging Adults.较低的心输出量与老年人的纵向认知衰退有关。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 9;11:569355. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569355. eCollection 2020.
3
Associations Between Cardiovascular Risk, Structural Brain Changes, and Cognitive Decline.心血管风险、大脑结构变化与认知能力下降之间的关联。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 26;75(20):2525-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.053.
4
Cerebral white matter lesion burden is associated with the degree of aortic valve calcification and predicts peri-procedural cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).脑白质病变负荷与主动脉瓣钙化程度相关,并可预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者围手术期脑血管事件。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):774-782. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27122. Epub 2017 May 26.
5
Subacute Subclinical Brain Infarctions after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Negatively Impact Cognitive Function in Long-Term Follow-Up.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的亚急性亚临床脑梗死对长期随访中的认知功能有负面影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0168852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168852. eCollection 2017.
6
Neurological Injury in Intermediate-Risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.中度风险经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的神经损伤
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 15;5(11):e004203. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004203.
7
Cognitive Outcomes of Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures in the Old: An Important but Neglected Area.
Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Dec;25(12):1148-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
8
Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在中危患者中的神经损伤比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):508-17. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0946-9. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
9
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术采用自膨胀式人工瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):967-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1408396.
10
The epidemiology of silent brain infarction: a systematic review of population-based cohorts.无症状脑梗死的流行病学:基于人群队列的系统评价
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 9;12:119. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0119-0.