Rogers Andrew M, Lermite Françoise, Griffin Andrea S, van Rensburg Berndt J, Kark Salit
Biodiversity Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 30;13(11):1807. doi: 10.3390/ani13111807.
Many bird species in Australia require tree hollows for breeding. However, assessing the benefits of urban nest boxes to native birds requires frequent monitoring that allows to assess nesting success. To better understand the benefits of nest boxes for native birds, we examined the impact of local habitat characteristics, invasive species (common myna, ), and native mammalian predators on urban nest box use and nesting success of native birds. We installed 216 nest boxes across nine locations in southeastern Australia (S.E. Queensland and northern New South Wales) in both long-invaded sites (invaded before 1970) and more recently invaded sites (after 1990). We monitored all boxes weekly over two breeding seasons. We recorded seven bird species and three mammal species using the nest boxes. Weekly box occupancy by all species averaged 8% of all boxes, with the species most frequently recorded in the nest boxes being the common brushtail possum (), a native cavity user and nest predator. We recorded 137 nesting attempts in the boxes across all bird species. The most frequent nesting species were the invasive alien common mynas (72 nesting attempts). We recorded an average nesting failure rate of 53.3% for all bird species. We did not record any common mynas evicting other nesting birds, and found that several native species used the same box after the common myna completed its nesting. We recorded native possums in 92% of the boxes, and possum occupancy of boxes per site was negatively correlated with bird nesting success ( = 0.021). These results suggest that when boxes are accessible to invasive species and native predators, they are unlikely to significantly improve nesting opportunities for native birds. To ensure efficient use of limited conservation resources, nest boxes should be designed to target species of high conservation importance and limit other species of both predators and competitors.
澳大利亚的许多鸟类物种需要树洞来繁殖。然而,评估城市鸟巢箱对本地鸟类的益处需要频繁监测,以便评估筑巢成功率。为了更好地了解鸟巢箱对本地鸟类的益处,我们研究了当地栖息地特征、入侵物种(家八哥)和本地哺乳动物捕食者对城市鸟巢箱使用情况以及本地鸟类筑巢成功率的影响。我们在澳大利亚东南部(昆士兰州东南部和新南威尔士州北部)的九个地点安装了216个鸟巢箱,这些地点既有长期被入侵的区域(1970年之前就已被入侵),也有最近被入侵的区域(1990年之后)。我们在两个繁殖季节每周对所有鸟巢箱进行监测。我们记录到有七种鸟类和三种哺乳动物使用这些鸟巢箱。所有物种每周对鸟巢箱的占用率平均为所有鸟巢箱的8%,在鸟巢箱中记录最频繁的物种是帚尾袋貂,它是本地的树洞使用者和巢穴捕食者。我们记录到所有鸟类物种在这些鸟巢箱中有137次筑巢尝试。筑巢最频繁的物种是入侵外来物种家八哥(72次筑巢尝试)。我们记录到所有鸟类物种的平均筑巢失败率为53.3%。我们没有记录到任何家八哥驱逐其他筑巢鸟类的情况,并且发现几种本地物种在家八哥完成筑巢后使用了同一个鸟巢箱。我们在92%的鸟巢箱中记录到了本地袋貂,每个地点袋貂对鸟巢箱的占用率与鸟类筑巢成功率呈负相关( = 0.021)。这些结果表明,当鸟巢箱可供入侵物种和本地捕食者使用时,它们不太可能显著改善本地鸟类的筑巢机会。为了确保有限的保护资源得到有效利用,鸟巢箱的设计应针对具有高度保护重要性的物种,并限制捕食者和竞争者等其他物种。