Fenner School of Environment and Society, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040622. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
There is widespread concern over the impact of introduced species on biodiversity, but the magnitude of these impacts can be variable. Understanding the impact of an introduced species is essential for effective management. However, empirical evidence of the impact of an introduced species can be difficult to obtain, especially when the impact is through competition. Change in species abundance is often slow and gradual, coinciding with environmental change. As a result, negative impacts on native species through competition are poorly documented. An example of the difficulties associated with obtaining empirical evidence of impact due to competition comes from work on the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis). The species is listed in the World's top 100 worst invaders, despite a lack of empirical evidence of its negative impacts on native species. We assessed the impact of the Common Myna on native bird abundance, using long-term data both pre and post its invasion. At the outset of our investigation, we postulated that Common Myna establishment would negatively affect the abundance of other cavity-nesting species and bird species that are smaller than it. We found a negative relationship between the establishment of the Common Myna and the long-term abundance of three cavity-nesting species (Sulphur-crested Cockatoo, Crimson Rosella, Laughing Kookaburra) and eight small bird species (Striated Paradoxes, Rufous Whistler, Willie Wagtail, Grey Fantail, Magpie-lark, House Sparrow, Silvereye, Common Blackbird). To the best of our knowledge, this finding has never previously been demonstrated at the population level. We discuss the key elements of our success in finding empirical evidence of a species impact and the implications for prioritisation of introduced species for management. Specifically, prioritization of the Common Myna for management over other species still remains a contentious issue.
人们普遍关注引入物种对生物多样性的影响,但这些影响的程度可能因情况而异。了解引入物种的影响对于有效管理至关重要。然而,引入物种影响的实证证据往往难以获得,尤其是当影响是通过竞争产生的。物种数量的变化通常是缓慢而渐进的,与环境变化相吻合。因此,竞争对本地物种的负面影响记录甚少。由于竞争而获得影响实证证据的困难的一个例子来自于对普通八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的研究。尽管缺乏其对本地物种产生负面影响的实证证据,但该物种仍被列入世界上最严重的 100 种入侵物种之列。我们使用入侵前后的长期数据评估了普通八哥对本地鸟类数量的影响。在我们调查的开始阶段,我们假设普通八哥的建立将对其他洞穴筑巢物种和比它小的鸟类的数量产生负面影响。我们发现,普通八哥的建立与三种洞穴筑巢物种(硫冠凤头鹦鹉、猩红凤头鹦鹉、笑翠鸟)和八种小型鸟类(条纹拟八哥、红胁蓝尾鸲、黄尾鹩哥、灰背伯劳、喜鹊、麻雀、银眼椋鸟、普通八哥)的长期数量呈负相关关系。据我们所知,这一发现以前从未在种群水平上得到证明。我们讨论了在发现物种影响的实证证据方面取得成功的关键因素,以及这些因素对管理引入物种的优先级的影响。具体而言,对普通八哥进行管理的优先级高于其他物种仍然是一个有争议的问题。