Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: comments.
作者信息
Elston R E
出版信息
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Nov;39(5):670-2.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: comments.关于父权指数的一些错误观念：评论
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Nov;39(5):670-2.
2
Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index.一些关于父权指数的错误观念。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Apr;38(4):582-9.
3
Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: A reply to Dr. Jack Valentin's comments.关于亲权指数的一些错误观点：对杰克·瓦伦丁博士评论的回应。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Apr;38(4):586-9.
4
[DNA polymorphism applied to paternity testing. Analysis of 877 cases].[应用于亲子鉴定的DNA多态性。877例分析]
Transfus Clin Biol. 1999 Jul;6(4):236-44. doi: 10.1016/s1246-7820(99)80034-2.
5
[Paternity testing and civil affairs].[亲子鉴定与民政事务]
J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):341-9.
6
[Does a probability of paternity exist?].[存在父系概率吗？]
Med Leg Dommage Corpor. 1971 Oct-Dec;4(4):348-50.
7
[Highly different values for the plausibility of fatherhood and for the exclusion chance (author's transl)].[关于父权合理性及排除几率的差异极大的值（作者译）]
Z Rechtsmed. 1978 Jul 27;81(3):217-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00201270.
8
Estimation of the probability of paternity. 3. Logarithmic method of computation.亲权概率的估算。3. 对数计算法。
Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha). 1970;16(3):225-34.
9
10
[Possibility of errors in establishing paternity based on serological findings in blood and serum group].[基于血型和血清型的血清学检查结果确定亲子关系时出错的可能性]
Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1970;27:313-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index: A reply to Dr. Jack Valentin's comments.关于亲权指数的一些错误观点：对杰克·瓦伦丁博士评论的回应。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Apr;38(4):586-9.
2
Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.亲权指数计算公式中的基本谬误。
Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;37(4):809-18.
3
Probability and paternity testing.
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Jul;39(1):112-22.
4
Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index.一些关于父权指数的错误观念。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Apr;38(4):582-9.
Zotero 插件