Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lancet. 2023 Nov 18;402(10415):1848-1856. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02189-X. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
Numerous randomised clinical trials and real-world studies have supported the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. However, a 2018 summary-level meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-coated devices compared with uncoated control devices. This study presents an updated analysis of deaths using the most complete and current data available from pivotal trials of paclitaxel-coated versus control devices.
Ten trials comparing paclitaxel-coated versus control devices were included in a patient-level pooled analysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on risk of death in both intention-to-treat (ITT; primary analysis) and three as-treated analysis sets accounting for treatment group crossover at the index procedure and over time. The effect of paclitaxel dose and baseline covariates were also evaluated.
A total of 2666 participants were included with a median follow-up of 4·9 years. No significant increase in deaths was observed for patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices. This was true in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 0·93-1·40), the as-treated analysis (HR 1·13, 95% CI 0·92-1·39), and in two crossover analyses: 1·07 (0·87-1·31) when late crossovers were censored and 1·04 (0·84-1·28) when crossovers were analysed from the date of paclitaxel exposure. There was no significant effect of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk.
This meta-analysis found no association between paclitaxel-coated device exposure and risk of death, providing reassurance to patients, physicians, and regulators on the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices.
Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Philips, Surmodics, and TriReme Medical.
大量随机临床试验和真实世界研究证实了紫杉醇涂层装置治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的安全性。然而,2018 年的一项汇总水平的荟萃分析表明,紫杉醇涂层装置与未涂层对照装置相比,死亡风险增加。本研究使用来自紫杉醇涂层与对照装置的关键性试验中最完整和最新的数据,对死亡进行了更新分析。
纳入了 10 项比较紫杉醇涂层与对照装置的试验,进行了患者水平的汇总分析。使用 Cox 回归模型评估紫杉醇暴露对意向治疗(ITT;主要分析)和三个基于治疗的分析组中死亡风险的影响,这些分析组考虑了索引手术和随时间推移的治疗组交叉。还评估了紫杉醇剂量和基线协变量的影响。
共纳入 2666 名参与者,中位随访时间为 4.9 年。接受紫杉醇涂层装置治疗的患者死亡无显著增加。在 ITT 分析(风险比[HR]1.14,95%CI0.93-1.40)、基于治疗的分析(HR1.13,95%CI0.92-1.39)和两种交叉分析中均如此:当晚期交叉被删失时为 1.07(0.87-1.31),当从紫杉醇暴露日期分析交叉时为 1.04(0.84-1.28)。紫杉醇剂量对死亡率风险无显著影响。
这项荟萃分析发现紫杉醇涂层装置暴露与死亡风险之间没有关联,这为患者、医生和监管机构提供了关于紫杉醇涂层装置安全性的保证。
贝克顿·迪金森、波士顿科学、库克、美敦力、飞利浦、Surmodics 和 TriReme Medical。