• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT在眼科急诊院前管理中的评估——对10个虚构病例 vignettes的分析

Assessment of ChatGPT in the Prehospital Management of Ophthalmological Emergencies - An Analysis of 10 Fictional Case Vignettes.

作者信息

Knebel Dominik, Priglinger Siegfried, Scherer Nicolas, Klaas Julian, Siedlecki Jakob, Schworm Benedikt

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2024 May;241(5):675-681. doi: 10.1055/a-2149-0447. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1055/a-2149-0447
PMID:37890504
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The artificial intelligence (AI)-based platform ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer, OpenAI LP, San Francisco, CA, USA) has gained impressive popularity in recent months. Its performance on case vignettes of general medical (non-ophthalmological) emergencies has been assessed - with very encouraging results. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of ChatGPT on ophthalmological emergency case vignettes in terms of the main outcome measures triage accuracy, appropriateness of recommended prehospital measures, and overall potential to inflict harm to the user/patient.

METHODS

We wrote ten short, fictional case vignettes describing different acute ophthalmological symptoms. Each vignette was entered into ChatGPT five times with the same wording and following a standardized interaction pathway. The answers were analyzed following a systematic approach.

RESULTS

We observed a triage accuracy of 93.6%. Most answers contained only appropriate recommendations for prehospital measures. However, an overall potential to inflict harm to users/patients was present in 32% of answers.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT should presently not be used as a stand-alone primary source of information about acute ophthalmological symptoms. As AI continues to evolve, its safety and efficacy in the prehospital management of ophthalmological emergencies has to be reassessed regularly.

摘要

背景

基于人工智能(AI)的平台ChatGPT(聊天生成预训练变换器,美国加利福尼亚州旧金山的OpenAI LP)在最近几个月获得了令人瞩目的人气。其在一般医疗(非眼科)紧急情况的病例 vignettes 上的表现已经过评估——结果非常令人鼓舞。本研究的目的是根据主要结局指标分诊准确性、推荐的院前措施的适当性以及对用户/患者造成伤害的总体可能性,评估ChatGPT在眼科紧急情况病例 vignettes 上的表现。

方法

我们撰写了十个简短的虚构病例 vignettes,描述不同的急性眼科症状。每个 vignette 以相同的措辞并按照标准化的交互路径输入ChatGPT五次。对答案进行系统分析。

结果

我们观察到分诊准确率为93.6%。大多数答案仅包含对院前措施的适当建议。然而,32%的答案中存在对用户/患者造成伤害的总体可能性。

结论

目前ChatGPT不应被用作关于急性眼科症状的独立主要信息来源。随着人工智能的不断发展,必须定期重新评估其在眼科紧急情况院前管理中的安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of ChatGPT in the Prehospital Management of Ophthalmological Emergencies - An Analysis of 10 Fictional Case Vignettes.ChatGPT在眼科急诊院前管理中的评估——对10个虚构病例 vignettes的分析
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2024 May;241(5):675-681. doi: 10.1055/a-2149-0447. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
2
"ChatGPT, Can You Help Me Save My Child's Life?" - Diagnostic Accuracy and Supportive Capabilities to Lay Rescuers by ChatGPT in Prehospital Basic Life Support and Paediatric Advanced Life Support Cases - An In-silico Analysis.“ChatGPT,你能帮我救我孩子的命吗?”——ChatGPT 在院前基础生命支持和儿科高级生命支持病例中对非专业救援人员的诊断准确性和支持能力——一项计算机模拟分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Nov 21;47(1):123. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02019-x.
3
Artificial intelligence chatbot performance in triage of ophthalmic conditions.人工智能聊天机器人在眼科疾病分诊中的表现。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;59(4):e301-e308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.07.016. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Accuracy of a Commercial Large Language Model (ChatGPT) to Perform Disaster Triage of Simulated Patients Using the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) Protocol: Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study.商用大型语言模型(ChatGPT)运用简单分诊与快速治疗(START)协议对模拟患者进行灾难分诊的准确性:再现性和可重复性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e55648. doi: 10.2196/55648.
5
The ChatGPT effect and transforming nursing education with generative AI: Discussion paper.ChatGPT 效应与生成式人工智能在护理教育中的变革:讨论文件。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Feb;75:103888. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103888. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
6
Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology.大语言模型(ChatGPT、必应搜索和谷歌巴德)在解决生理学病例 vignettes 中的表现。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 4;15(8):e42972. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42972. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) and Bard: Artificial Intelligence Does not yet Provide Clinically Supported Answers for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)和巴德:人工智能尚未为髋和膝关节骨关节炎提供临床支持的答案。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1184-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
How Appropriate Are Recommendations of Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) to Common Questions on Ventral Hernia Repair?在线聊天人工智能(ChatGPT)对腹疝修补常见问题的建议是否合适?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Apr;34(4):365-367. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0475. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
9
Appropriateness of Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) Answers to Common Questions on Inguinal Hernia Repair.基于在线聊天的人工智能(ChatGPT)对腹股沟疝修补常见问题回答的适宜性。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):141-143. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0403. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
A comparative vignette study: Evaluating the potential role of a generative AI model in enhancing clinical decision-making in nursing.一项比较性案例研究:评估生成式人工智能模型在增强护理临床决策中的潜在作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Feb 17. doi: 10.1111/jan.16101.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential of ChatGPT in youth mental health emergency triage: Comparative analysis with clinicians.ChatGPT在青少年心理健康紧急分诊中的潜力:与临床医生的比较分析
PCN Rep. 2025 Jul 15;4(3):e70159. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70159. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Leveraging large language models to mimic domain expert labeling in unstructured text-based electronic healthcare records in non-english languages.利用大语言模型在非英语的基于文本的非结构化电子健康记录中模拟领域专家标注。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02871-6.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance comparison between generative AI and physicians.
生成式人工智能与医生诊断性能比较的系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 22;8(1):175. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01543-z.
4
Current applications and challenges in large language models for patient care: a systematic review.用于患者护理的大语言模型的当前应用与挑战:一项系统综述
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jan 21;5(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00717-2.
5
The Utility and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chatbots in Healthcare.人工智能驱动的聊天机器人在医疗保健中的效用与局限性
Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73127. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73127. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Applications of ChatGPT in the diagnosis, management, education, and research of retinal diseases: a scoping review.ChatGPT在视网膜疾病诊断、管理、教育及研究中的应用:一项范围综述
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Oct 17;10(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00595-9.
7
Foundation models in ophthalmology: opportunities and challenges.眼科领域的基础模型:机遇与挑战。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 1;36(1):90-98. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001091. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
8
Diagnostic Accuracy of ChatGPT for Patients' Triage; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ChatGPT对患者分诊的诊断准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 30;12(1):e60. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2384. eCollection 2024.
9
Artificial Versus Human Intelligence in the Diagnostic Approach of Ophthalmic Case Scenarios: A Qualitative Evaluation of Performance and Consistency.眼科病例诊断方法中的人工智能与人类智能:性能与一致性的定性评估
Cureus. 2024 Jun 16;16(6):e62471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62471. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
The ethics of ChatGPT in medicine and healthcare: a systematic review on Large Language Models (LLMs).ChatGPT在医学与医疗保健领域的伦理问题:关于大语言模型(LLMs)的系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 8;7(1):183. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01157-x.