Suppr超能文献

经鼻胃管与经鼻空肠管喂养用于重症急性胰腺炎:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。

Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.

Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis (URSIGET), Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.

出版信息

Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2023 Jul-Sep;43(3):207-216.

Abstract

Early enteral nutrition through a feeding tube is essential for the management of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Nasojejunal tube nutrition has been preferred on the assumption that it provided pancreatic rest in comparison to the nasogastric tube. However, nasojejunal tube placement is complex, may delay feeding initiation and can increase hospital costs. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of enteral feeding with a nasogastric tube versus nasojejunal tube in patients with SAP. We searched four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase) until December 1, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing enteral feeding by nasogastric and nasojejunal tubes in patients with SAP. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were organ failure, infection, complications, surgical intervention, duration of tube feeding and length of hospital stay. Risk of bias assessment was completed independently by two investigators using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. We performed random effects model meta-analyses using the inverse variance method. Effect measures were reported as relative risks (RR) and their 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) and their 95% CIs for continuous outcomes. We included four RCTs involving 192 patients with SAP. The mean ages ranged between 36 and 62 years old. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding arms (18/98 vs. 23/93; RR 1.34, 95%CI 0.77-2.30; p=0.30). There were no significant differences in all secondary outcomes between feeding arms. There were three RCTs with some concerns of bias, in the randomization process. In conclusion, in patients with SAP, enteral feeding delivered by nasogastric tube was as efficacious and safe as nasojejunal tube. Further randomized controlled trials with more participants and better design are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

早期通过喂养管进行肠内营养对于重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)的治疗至关重要。与鼻胃管相比,人们认为鼻空肠管营养可以提供胰腺休息,因此优先选择使用。然而,鼻空肠管的放置较为复杂,可能会延迟喂养的开始,并增加医院的成本。我们的目的是比较 SAP 患者经鼻胃管和鼻空肠管进行肠内营养的疗效和安全性。我们在 2022 年 12 月 1 日之前在四个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Embase)中进行了检索。我们纳入了比较 SAP 患者经鼻胃管和鼻空肠管进行肠内营养的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是全因死亡率。次要结局是器官衰竭、感染、并发症、手术干预、管饲时间和住院时间。两名研究者独立使用 Cochrane RoB 2.0 工具进行了偏倚风险评估。我们使用逆方差法进行了随机效应模型荟萃分析。二分类结局的效应指标为相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),连续性结局的效应指标为均数差(MD)及其 95%CI。我们纳入了四项涉及 192 例 SAP 患者的 RCT。患者的平均年龄在 36 至 62 岁之间。鼻胃管和鼻空肠喂养组的全因死亡率无显著差异(18/98 与 23/93;RR 1.34,95%CI 0.77-2.30;p=0.30)。两组在所有次要结局上均无显著差异。有三项 RCT 在随机化过程中存在一定的偏倚风险。总之,对于 SAP 患者,经鼻胃管进行肠内营养与经鼻空肠管同样有效且安全。需要更多参与者和更好设计的随机对照试验来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验