Wójcicki Rafał, Pielak Tomasz, Erdmann Jakub, Walus Piotr, Małkowski Bartłomiej, Ohla Jakub, Łapaj Łukasz, Wiciński Michał, Zabrzyński Jan
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, J. Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-001 Kielce, Poland.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 16;12(20):6553. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206553.
the aim of this study was to document the occurrence of THA after acetabulum surgery and examine the factors that predict its occurrence.
This study included 77 consecutive patients who were admitted for acetabulum fracture surgery between 2012 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were acetabular fractures and indications for operative management. The exclusion criteria were acetabular fractures treated non-operatively, fractures requiring primary THA, and periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Data concerning demographics, date of injury, date of surgery, surgical approach, stabilization, and further reconstructive surgery were collected retrospectively. The number of patients who underwent THA and their risk factors were recorded. The minimum follow-up for each patient was 2 years of observation. A total of 77 patients with a mean age of 53 years were included.
At a mean follow-up of 2 years, THA was performed in 16 (20.8%) patients due to post-traumatic arthritis. An analysis of the surgical approaches showed that the Kocher-Langenbeck approach increased the risk of THA nearly 12 times compared with the ilioinguinal approach ( = 0.016). Furthermore, the duration of the waiting period for surgery significantly impacted the occurrence of THA, with each additional day leading to an 89% increase in the risk of prosthesis usage ( = 0.001).
This study suggests that acetabular fractures may lead to post-traumatic hip osteoarthritis. The surgical approach and the waiting time for surgery are potential factors that may predict secondary hip osteoarthritis and the need for subsequent THA. However, further investigations should be performed to establish predictors for secondary hip osteoarthritis, and especially to determine the impact of the surgical approach.
本研究旨在记录髋臼手术后全髋关节置换术(THA)的发生情况,并探讨预测其发生的因素。
本研究纳入了2012年至2019年间连续收治的77例因髋臼骨折接受手术的患者。纳入标准为髋臼骨折及手术治疗指征。排除标准为非手术治疗的髋臼骨折、需要初次THA的骨折以及假体周围髋臼骨折。回顾性收集有关人口统计学、受伤日期、手术日期、手术入路、固定方式及进一步重建手术的数据。记录接受THA的患者数量及其危险因素。每位患者的最短随访观察时间为2年。共纳入77例平均年龄为53岁的患者。
平均随访2年时,16例(20.8%)患者因创伤后关节炎接受了THA。手术入路分析显示,与髂腹股沟入路相比,Kocher-Langenbeck入路使THA风险增加近12倍(P = 0.016)。此外,手术等待期的长短对THA的发生有显著影响,等待时间每增加一天,假体使用风险增加89%(P = 0.001)。
本研究表明髋臼骨折可能导致创伤后髋骨关节炎。手术入路和手术等待时间是可能预测继发性髋骨关节炎及后续THA需求的潜在因素。然而,应进行进一步研究以确定继发性髋骨关节炎的预测因素,尤其是确定手术入路的影响。