• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麦草畏和草甘膦在咖啡作物上的模拟漂移

Simulated Drift of Dicamba and Glyphosate on Coffee Crop.

作者信息

Zampiroli Renan, da Cunha João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues, de Alvarenga Cleyton Batista

机构信息

Institute of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38408-100, Brazil.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;12(20):3525. doi: 10.3390/plants12203525.

DOI:10.3390/plants12203525
PMID:37895989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10610131/
Abstract

Weed management in areas adjacent to coffee plantations makes herbicide drift a constant concern, especially with the use of nonselective products such as dicamba. The objective of this study was to evaluate the phytotoxic effects of the herbicide dicamba alone and mixed with glyphosate as a result of simulated drift in a coffee-producing area. The study was conducted in duplicate at two different coffee cherry development stages. The study was performed with a randomized block design and a 2 × 5 + 1 factorial scheme with four replications using two herbicide spray solutions (dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate) and five low doses (0.25; 1; 5; 10; and 20%). Additionally, a control treatment without herbicide application was also employed. In this study, we evaluated the phytotoxic damage and biometric and productive parameters. Visual damages were observed with the use of dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate doses reduced by 0.25% to 5% in the first days after application. The main symptoms were new leaf epinasty, changes in the internodal distance, and plagiotropic branch curvature. Low doses led to reduced plant height and branch length. The treatments did not reduce productivity and performance but altered the physical classifications of grains.

摘要

在咖啡种植园周边地区进行杂草管理时,除草剂漂移一直是个令人担忧的问题,尤其是在使用麦草畏等非选择性产品时。本研究的目的是评估在咖啡产区模拟漂移情况下,单独使用除草剂麦草畏以及将其与草甘膦混合使用所产生的植物毒性效应。该研究在咖啡樱桃的两个不同发育阶段重复进行了两次。研究采用随机区组设计和2×5 + 1析因方案,设置四个重复,使用两种除草剂喷雾溶液(麦草畏和麦草畏 + 草甘膦)以及五个低剂量(0.25%;1%;5%;10%和20%)。此外,还设置了一个不施用除草剂的对照处理。在本研究中,我们评估了植物毒性损害以及生物特征和生产参数。施用后最初几天,使用0.25%至5%剂量的麦草畏和麦草畏 + 草甘膦时观察到了可见损害。主要症状包括新叶偏上性、节间距离变化以及斜生枝条弯曲。低剂量导致植株高度和枝条长度降低。这些处理并未降低产量和性能,但改变了谷粒的物理分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/dd1e8e2f8393/plants-12-03525-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/f0edba116db8/plants-12-03525-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/b2fb03a67578/plants-12-03525-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/2c67ca016738/plants-12-03525-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/07b8b1066838/plants-12-03525-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/6ae291aa922a/plants-12-03525-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/8fba8313548b/plants-12-03525-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/9e422dddfe93/plants-12-03525-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/dd1e8e2f8393/plants-12-03525-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/f0edba116db8/plants-12-03525-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/b2fb03a67578/plants-12-03525-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/2c67ca016738/plants-12-03525-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/07b8b1066838/plants-12-03525-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/6ae291aa922a/plants-12-03525-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/8fba8313548b/plants-12-03525-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/9e422dddfe93/plants-12-03525-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c33/10610131/dd1e8e2f8393/plants-12-03525-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulated Drift of Dicamba and Glyphosate on Coffee Crop.麦草畏和草甘膦在咖啡作物上的模拟漂移
Plants (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;12(20):3525. doi: 10.3390/plants12203525.
2
Can herbicides of different mode of action cause injury symptoms in non-herbicide-tolerant young soybean due to simulated drift?不同作用机制的除草剂是否会因模拟飘移而对非耐除草剂的幼大豆造成伤害症状?
J Environ Sci Health B. 2023;58(12):726-743. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2023.2275512. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Simulated herbicide drift alters native plant flowering phenology.模拟除草剂飘移改变了本地植物的开花物候。
Ecotoxicology. 2024 Nov;33(9):1009-1025. doi: 10.1007/s10646-024-02795-3. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Reduced Translocation of Glyphosate and Dicamba in Combination Contributes to Poor Control of Kochia scoparia: Evidence of Herbicide Antagonism.草甘膦和二甲四氯组合的迁移减少导致对藜的防治效果不佳:除草剂拮抗的证据。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 28;8(1):5330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23742-3.
5
Hormesis with glyphosate depends on coffee growth stage.草甘膦的毒物兴奋效应取决于咖啡的生长阶段。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2013 Apr-Jun;85(2):813-21. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652013005000027.
6
Response of Amaranthus spp. following exposure to sublethal herbicide rates via spray particle drift.通过喷雾粒子漂移接触亚致死除草剂浓度后,苋菜属植物的反应。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0220014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220014. eCollection 2019.
7
Spray drift potential of dicamba plus S-metolachlor formulations.二甲苯草胺与 S-甲草胺制剂的喷雾漂移潜力。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Apr;78(4):1538-1546. doi: 10.1002/ps.6772. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
8
Glyphosate spray drift in Coffea arabica - sensitivity of coffee plants and possible use of shikimic acid as a biomarker for glyphosate exposure.草甘膦在阿拉比卡咖啡中的喷雾漂移——咖啡植株的敏感性以及莽草酸作为草甘膦暴露生物标志物的潜在用途。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2014 Oct;115:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
Impact of volatility reduction agents on dicamba and glyphosate spray solution pH, droplet dynamics, and weed control.降低挥发性制剂对麦草畏和草甘膦喷雾溶液 pH 值、液滴动力学和杂草防治的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Feb;79(2):857-869. doi: 10.1002/ps.7258. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
10
Glyphosate and dicamba herbicide tank mixture effects on native plant and non-genetically engineered soybean seedlings.草甘膦和麦草畏除草剂桶混剂对本地植物及非转基因大豆幼苗的影响
Ecotoxicology. 2015 Jul;24(5):1014-27. doi: 10.1007/s10646-015-1442-8. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Soybean dose-response to 2,4-D and dicamba at vegetative and reproductive growth stages.大豆在营养生长和生殖生长阶段对 2,4-D 和二甲四氯的剂量反应。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Jul;78(7):2759-2766. doi: 10.1002/ps.6863. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Effect of nozzle selection on deposition of thiamethoxam in Actara® spray drift and implications for off-field risk assessment.喷头选择对阿克泰®喷雾漂移中噻虫嗪沉积的影响及其对场外风险评估的意义。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 10;772:144808. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144808. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Spray drift mitigation using opposing synchronized air-blast sprayers.
使用对置同步风送喷雾机减少喷雾漂移。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Feb;77(2):895-905. doi: 10.1002/ps.6094. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Identification of environmental factors that influence the likelihood of off-target movement of dicamba.鉴定影响二甲苯草甘膦产生非靶标运动的环境因素。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Sep;76(9):3282-3291. doi: 10.1002/ps.5887. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Aminomethylphosphonic acid accumulation in plant species treated with glyphosate.草甘膦处理的植物物种中氨甲基膦酸的积累
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Mar 26;56(6):2125-30. doi: 10.1021/jf072954f. Epub 2008 Feb 26.