Salgado E D, Weinstein M, Furlan A J, Modic M T, Beck G J, Estes M, Awad I, Little J R
Ann Neurol. 1986 Oct;20(4):502-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.410200410.
Proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a 0.6- or 1.5-Tesla superconductive magnet was compared with high-resolution computed tomography (CT) in 60 patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or brain infarction. MRI showed focal parenchymal changes in 84% of patients with TIAs, whereas CT showed similar changes in 42%. The sensitivity of MRI was also greater in patients with infarcts, but the difference between CT and MRI was not as great. Infarcts were usually better delineated by MRI regardless of location. However, MRI failed to reveal cortical infarcts that were clearly seen on contrast-enhanced CT scans and was unable to clearly distinguish subacute from chronic hemorrhagic infarcts. MRI changes were best detected with T2-weighted images and usually appeared as multiple areas of increased signal intensity in the subcortical and periventricular white matter. MRI changes often could not be correlated with the clinical history and neurological findings; identical changes have been seen in patients with no history of cerebrovascular disease.
在60例短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或脑梗死患者中,对使用0.6或1.5特斯拉超导磁体的质子磁共振成像(MRI)与高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)进行了比较。MRI显示84%的TIA患者有局灶性实质改变,而CT显示有类似改变的患者为42%。在梗死患者中,MRI的敏感性也更高,但CT与MRI之间的差异没有那么大。无论梗死位置如何,MRI通常能更好地勾勒出梗死灶。然而,MRI未能显示出在增强CT扫描中清晰可见的皮质梗死灶,并且无法清晰地区分亚急性出血性梗死灶和慢性出血性梗死灶。T2加权图像能最好地检测到MRI的改变,通常表现为皮质下和脑室周围白质中多个信号强度增加的区域。MRI的改变常常与临床病史和神经学检查结果不相关;在无脑血管疾病病史的患者中也发现了相同的改变。