Shen Lijiang, Lee Daniel
Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;11(10):1597. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101597.
This study investigates and compares the predictors of COVID-19 and influenza vaccination confidence and uptake in the U.S. Vaccine hesitancy is defined as the reluctance or refusal (i.e., less than 100% behavioral intention) to vaccinate despite the availability of effective and safe vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy is a major obstacle in the fight against infectious diseases such as COVID-19 and influenza. Predictors of vaccination intention are identified using the reasoned action approach and the integrated behavioral model. Data from two national samples ( = 1131 for COVID-19 and = 1126 for influenza) were collected from U.S. Qualtrics panels. Tobit regression models were estimated to predict percentage increases in vaccination intention (i.e., confidence) and the probability of vaccination uptake (i.e., intention reaching 100%). The results provided evidence for the reasoned approach and the IBM model and showed that the predictors followed different patterns for COVID-19 and influenza. The implications for intervention strategies and message designs were discussed.
本研究调查并比较了美国新冠病毒疫苗和流感疫苗接种信心及接种率的预测因素。疫苗犹豫被定义为尽管有有效且安全的疫苗,但仍不愿或拒绝接种(即行为意愿低于100%)。疫苗犹豫是抗击新冠病毒和流感等传染病的主要障碍。使用理性行动方法和整合行为模型来确定接种意愿的预测因素。从美国Qualtrics面板收集了两个全国样本的数据(新冠病毒样本n = 1131,流感样本n = 1126)。估计了Tobit回归模型,以预测接种意愿(即信心)的百分比增长以及接种率(即意愿达到100%)的概率。结果为理性方法和IBM模型提供了证据,并表明新冠病毒和流感的预测因素遵循不同模式。讨论了对干预策略和信息设计的影响。