Sexuality, Health, and Gender Center, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Elaine C. Hubbard Center for Nursing Research on Aging, School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 23;14(3):149-155. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad068.
Structural and systemic barriers entrenched in academia have sustained for decades, and resulted in a lack of diversity in leadership positions, inequitable workloads for women and underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, and increasing issues with retention of faculty, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. Increasing opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education via legislation, policies, and general anti-DEI sentiment contextualizes the importance of prioritizing DEI. The goal of this commentary is to open discussion among academic institutions regarding changes in DEI culture that will facilitate the growth of diverse early-career faculty (ECF). We use an adapted framework which incorporates DEI into a faculty competency model to (i) guide our discussion of the rationale for restructuring academic systems to promote DEI and (ii) recommend strategies for institutional progress for ECF that can translate across academic institutions. Implementing policies and practices that seek to recruit, retain, and support historically underrepresented ECF are needed, and may involve faculty mentorship programs, establishing equitable funding mechanisms, reforming faculty evaluation practices, and examining and correcting inequities in faculty workloads. The onus is on institutions to recognize and replace the exclusionary practices and biases that have existed within their walls, and continuously promote and monitor their DEI efforts and initiatives to ensure their efficacy. Inclusive academic cultures that demonstrate their value of diversity and commitment to equity promotion at all levels of the organization, including among ECF, are necessary for ensuring excellence in scholarship in academia.
结构性和系统性障碍在学术界根深蒂固已经数十年,导致领导层缺乏多样性,女性和代表性不足的种族/族裔群体的工作量不平等,以及教职员工的保留问题日益严重,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行之后。通过立法、政策和普遍的反 DEI 情绪,对高等教育中的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)努力的日益反对,使优先考虑 DEI 变得尤为重要。本评论的目的是在学术机构中就 DEI 文化的变革展开讨论,这将有助于多元化的早期职业教师(ECF)的成长。我们使用了一个经过改编的框架,将 DEI 纳入教师能力模型中,(i)指导我们讨论重构学术系统以促进 DEI 的基本原理,(ii)为 ECF 的机构进步推荐策略,这些策略可以在各学术机构之间转化。需要实施旨在招募、留住和支持历史上代表性不足的 ECF 的政策和实践,这可能涉及教师指导计划、建立公平的资金机制、改革教师评估实践,以及审查和纠正教师工作量中的不平等。各机构有责任认识到并取代其内部存在的排斥性做法和偏见,并不断促进和监督其 DEI 努力和倡议,以确保其有效性。包容的学术文化在组织的各个层面,包括 ECF,展示其多样性的价值和对公平促进的承诺,是确保学术界学术卓越的必要条件。