N.C. Woitowich is research assistant professor, Women's Health Research Institute and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3449-2547 .
S. Jain is assistant professor, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Acad Med. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):813-816. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003782.
Women remain underrepresented within academic medicine despite past and present efforts to promote gender equity. The authors discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic could stymie progress toward gender parity within the biomedical workforce and limit the retention and advancement of women in science and medicine. Women faculty face distinct challenges as they navigate the impact of shelter-in-place and social distancing on work and home life. An unequal division of household labor and family care between men and women means women faculty are vulnerable to inequities that may develop in the workplace as they strive to maintain academic productivity and professional development without adequate assistance with domestic tasks and family care. Emerging data suggest that gender differences in academic productivity may be forthcoming as a direct result of the pandemic. Existing gender inequities in professional visibility, networking, and collaboration may be exacerbated as activities transition from in-person to virtual environments and create new barriers to advancement. Meanwhile, initiatives designed to promote gender equity within academic medicine may lose key funding due to the economic impact of COVID-19 on higher education. To ensure that the gender gap within academic medicine does not widen, the authors call upon academic leaders and the broader biomedical community to support women faculty through deliberate actions that promote gender equity, diversity, and inclusion. The authors provide several recommendations, including faculty needs assessments; review of gender bias within tenure-clock-extension offers; more opportunities for mentorship, sponsorship, and professional recognition; and financial commitments to support equity initiatives. Leadership for these efforts should be at the institutional and departmental levels, and leaders should ensure a gender balance on task forces and committees to avoid overburdening women faculty with additional service work. Together, these strategies will contribute to the development of a more equitable workforce capable of transformative medical discovery and care.
尽管过去和现在都在努力促进性别平等,但女性在学术医学领域的代表性仍然不足。本文作者讨论了 COVID-19 大流行如何阻碍生物医学劳动力中的性别均等化进程,并限制女性在科学和医学领域的留任和晋升。女性教职员工在应对就地避难和社交隔离对工作和家庭生活的影响时,面临着独特的挑战。男女之间不平等的家务劳动和家庭护理分工意味着,女性教职员工在努力保持学术生产力和专业发展的同时,由于缺乏足够的家庭任务和家庭护理帮助,她们容易受到工作场所可能出现的不平等的影响。新出现的数据表明,学术生产力的性别差异可能是 COVID-19 直接导致的。专业可见度、网络和合作方面现有的性别不平等可能会加剧,因为活动从面对面转向虚拟环境,并为晋升创造新的障碍。与此同时,旨在促进学术医学领域性别平等的举措可能会因 COVID-19 对高等教育的经济影响而失去关键资金。为了确保学术医学领域的性别差距不会扩大,作者呼吁学术领导人和更广泛的生物医学社区通过促进性别平等、多样性和包容性的刻意行动来支持女性教职员工。作者提出了一些建议,包括教职员工需求评估;审查任期时钟延期提供中的性别偏见;为指导、赞助和专业认可提供更多机会;以及为支持公平倡议提供财政承诺。这些努力的领导权应在机构和部门层面,领导者应确保在工作队和委员会中保持性别平衡,以避免让女性教职员工承担过多的额外服务工作。这些策略将共同为发展更公平的劳动力做出贡献,使他们能够进行变革性的医学发现和护理。