Templeman Maureen E, Lee Soomi, Haley William E
Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Gerontology, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA.
School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2024 Sep;99(2):179-199. doi: 10.1177/00914150231208680. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
This study investigated stressors and strains, resources, and well-being among Black working caregivers (BWC) and White working caregivers (WWC) who participated in the Midlife in the United States study (Black: = 49, White: = 250). Comparisons were made between BWC and WWC for primary caregiving stressors, secondary strains, resources, and well-being, and hierarchical regression models tested associations among these factors. BWC reported less negative work-to-family spillover, more perceived control and religious/spiritual coping, and higher positive affect than WWC, complementing existing evidence of greater resilience among BWC. Secondary strains stemming from the workplace had stronger associations with well-being than primary caregiving stressors, confirming that the workplace deserves greater attention in stress research and interventions for working caregivers. Finally, perceived control, optimism, and family support were important resources for well-being for both BWC and WWC, substantiating their valuable role in interventions for working caregivers.
本研究调查了参与美国中年研究的黑人在职照顾者(BWC,n = 49)和白人在职照顾者(WWC,n = 250)的压力源与压力、资源和幸福感。对BWC和WWC在主要照顾压力源、次要压力、资源和幸福感方面进行了比较,并通过分层回归模型检验了这些因素之间的关联。与WWC相比,BWC报告的工作对家庭的负面溢出效应更少,感知到的控制感和宗教/精神应对方式更多,积极情绪更高,这补充了现有关于BWC具有更强复原力的证据。来自工作场所的次要压力与幸福感的关联比主要照顾压力源更强,这证实了工作场所在在职照顾者的压力研究和干预中应得到更多关注。最后,感知到的控制感、乐观主义和家庭支持是BWC和WWC幸福感的重要资源,证实了它们在在职照顾者干预中的重要作用。