Suppr超能文献

当前生物制剂治疗落叶型天疱疮:系统评价。

Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review.

机构信息

Midwestern University, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, AZ, United States.

Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Disease, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 12;14:1267668. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg.

RESULTS

Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively.

DISCUSSION

In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life.

摘要

背景

落叶型天疱疮(PF)与寻常型天疱疮(PV)不同,它仅影响皮肤,不涉及粘膜。天疱疮通常采用全身性皮质类固醇和免疫抑制剂(ISA)治疗。最近,生物制剂也已被使用。目前关于生物疗法的文献通常将 PF 与 PV 的治疗结合在一起,因此临床医生往往难以将 PF 的治疗与 PV 分开。本综述的目的是提供有关当前生物疗法的信息,特别是在 PF 中的应用。

材料和方法

使用关键词天疱疮、利妥昔单抗(RTX)、静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)和生物制剂,在 PubMed、Embase 和其他数据库中进行了搜索。本综述共纳入 41 项研究,其中包括 105 例接受 RTX、IVIg 或两者联合治疗的 PF 患者。85 例患者接受 RTX 治疗,8 例患者接受 IVIg 治疗,12 例患者同时接受 RTX 和 IVIg 治疗。

结果

本综述中的大多数患者患有对传统免疫抑制疗法(CIST)无反应的 PF,并且使用这些药物有明显的副作用。RTX 治疗导致 63.2%的患者完全缓解(CR),复发率为 39.5%,感染率为 19.7%,死亡率为 3.9%。淋巴瘤(LP)方案的复发率高于类风湿关节炎(RA)方案(p<0.0001)。IVIg 导致 62.5%的患者 CR,无复发或感染。当首先给予 RTX 然后给予 IVIg 时,同时接受两种生物制剂的患者的治疗效果更好。接受 RTX、IVIg 和两者的患者的随访时间分别为 22.1、24.8 和 35.7 个月。

讨论

在对传统免疫抑制治疗无反应或对 CIST 有明显副作用的 PF 患者中,RTX 和 IVIg 似乎是有用的药物。PF 患者接受 RTX 治疗后的临床反应、复发、感染和死亡率与 PV 患者相似。数据表明,针对 PF 的特定方案可能会产生更好的结果、更少的不良反应和提高生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/10600482/7ee1dea7267d/fimmu-14-1267668-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验