Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Institute for Educational and Health-Care Research in the Health Sector, Hochschule Bielefeld-University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Bielefeld, Germany.
Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(23):21335-21353. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6490. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
Early palliative care (EPC) has been advocated to improve cancer patients' health. However, EPC differs with regard to its elements and target groups. It is not known which parts of EPC contribute to effectiveness for which patient group. This scoping review provides a structured analysis of EPC interventions and outcome measures.
We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL up to February 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT), nonrandomized trials, cohort studies (CS), and controlled before-after studies of EPC in adult patients in English, Dutch, and German language. Interventions had to be self-labeled as EPC. Screening and data extraction were performed by two raters. A structured analysis incorporating the TIDieR checklist was performed to describe the elements of the interventions.
We screened 2651 articles, resulting in 40 articles being included: 34 studies were RCT and six studies were CS with a mean sample size of 208 patients. Patients with pancreatic (n = 10) and lung cancer (n = 9) were most often included. Studies reported different reference points for the onset of EPC such as time after diagnosis of incurable cancer (n = 18) or prognosis (n = 9). Thirteen studies provided information about elements of EPC and eight studies about the control intervention. Most frequent elements of EPC were symptom management (n = 28), case management (n = 16), and advance care planning (ACP; n = 15). Most frequently reported outcome measures were health-related quality of life (n = 26), symptom intensity (n = 6), resource use, and the patient's mood (n = 4 each).
The elicited heterogeneity of ECP in combination with deficits of reporting are considerable barriers that should be addressed to further develop effective EPC interventions for different groups of cancer patients.
早期姑息治疗(EPC)已被提倡用于改善癌症患者的健康状况。然而,EPC 在其要素和目标人群方面存在差异。目前尚不清楚 EPC 的哪些部分对哪些患者群体有效。本范围综述对 EPC 干预措施和结果测量进行了结构化分析。
我们检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 CENTRAL,截至 2022 年 2 月。我们纳入了以英语、荷兰语和德语发表的成人患者的随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机试验、队列研究(CS)和对照前后研究。干预措施必须自行标记为 EPC。筛选和数据提取由两名审核员进行。采用包含 TIDieR 清单的结构化分析来描述干预措施的要素。
我们筛选了 2651 篇文章,最终纳入了 40 篇文章:34 项研究为 RCT,6 项研究为 CS,平均样本量为 208 例患者。最常纳入的患者为胰腺癌(n=10)和肺癌(n=9)患者。研究报告了 EPC 开始的不同参考点,例如无法治愈的癌症诊断后时间(n=18)或预后(n=9)。13 项研究提供了 EPC 要素的信息,8 项研究提供了对照干预措施的信息。EPC 最常见的要素是症状管理(n=28)、病例管理(n=16)和预先护理计划(ACP;n=15)。最常报告的结果测量是健康相关生活质量(n=26)、症状强度(n=6)、资源利用和患者情绪(n=4)。
EPC 的异质性以及报告的不足是相当大的障碍,应该加以解决,以进一步为不同癌症患者群体开发有效的 EPC 干预措施。