• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人功能能力领域贡献能力测量的心理测量学特性:COSMIN 系统评价。

Psychometric properties of ability to contribute measurements as a domain of functional ability of older persons: a COSMIN systematic review.

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, Ciudad de México, México.

Global Health Research Departament, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 28;52(Suppl 4):iv138-iv148. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad099.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afad099
PMID:37902526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10615053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older person's ability to contribute covers contributions divided into five subdomains: assisting friends and neighbours, mentoring peers and younger people, caring for family, engaging in the workforce and voluntary activity.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of ability to contribute measurements as a domain of functional ability of older persons using Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, for observational studies published within the last 10 years. The measurement properties of these ability measures were evaluated against the COSMIN taxonomy. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 32,665 studies identified, we selected 19, of which the main purpose was to develop or validate an instrument or have related items that measure at least one of the subdomains. None of the instruments contained items that were fully related to the five subdomains, 60% (n = 12) were related to voluntary activities and 15% (n = 3) to mentoring peers and younger people. As for psychometric properties, two studies assessed content validity. Factor analysis was used to evaluate structural validity in 10 studies. Internal consistency was evaluated in 63% of the instruments and Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.63 to 0.92. No study reported predictive validity. A very limited overview of their scope and limitations for their application was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no single instrument measuring all subdomains of ability to contribute. We found several instruments containing items that could indirectly measure some of the subdomains of the ability to contribute.

摘要

背景

老年人的贡献能力涵盖五个子领域的贡献:帮助朋友和邻居、指导同龄人及年轻人、照顾家庭、参与劳动力市场和志愿活动。

目的

使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)方法学对系统综述进行评估,以确定老年人能力贡献测量作为功能能力领域的心理测量学特性。

方法

在 PubMed、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库中进行了系统搜索,以查找过去 10 年内发表的观察性研究。使用 COSMIN 偏倚风险检查表评估这些能力测量的测量特性。

结果

在 32665 项研究中,我们选择了 19 项,其中主要目的是开发或验证一种工具或具有至少一个子领域相关项目的工具。没有一种工具包含与五个子领域完全相关的项目,60%(n=12)与志愿活动有关,15%(n=3)与指导同龄人及年轻人有关。关于心理测量学特性,有两项研究评估了内容效度。结构效度使用因子分析在 10 项研究中进行评估。63%的工具评估了内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha 范围为 0.63 至 0.92。没有研究报告预测效度。对其应用范围和局限性的简要概述很少。

结论

我们没有发现单一的工具可以测量能力贡献的所有子领域。我们发现了一些包含可以间接测量能力贡献的一些子领域的项目的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b757/10615053/94071dd00f92/afad099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b757/10615053/94071dd00f92/afad099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b757/10615053/94071dd00f92/afad099f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of ability to contribute measurements as a domain of functional ability of older persons: a COSMIN systematic review.老年人功能能力领域贡献能力测量的心理测量学特性:COSMIN 系统评价。
Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 28;52(Suppl 4):iv138-iv148. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad099.
2
Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.社区和机构环境中老年人虐待情况测量工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 29;20(3):e1419. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1419. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
PROTOCOL: Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring elder abuse and neglect in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.方案:社区和机构环境中测量虐待和忽视老年人工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 27;19(3):e1342. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1342. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
6
Measurement Instruments Assessing Multi-Faceted Stigma Regarding Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.测量工具评估针对性少数和性别少数群体的多方面污名:心理测量特性的系统综述。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Jun;28(6):2054-2077. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04305-2. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
Diabetes distress instruments in adults with Type 1 diabetes: A systematic review using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) checklist.1型糖尿病成人患者的糖尿病困扰评估工具:一项使用COSMIN(基于共识的健康状况测量工具选择标准)清单的系统评价
Diabet Med. 2021 Apr;38(4):e14468. doi: 10.1111/dme.14468. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
8
COSMIN Checklist for Systematic Reviews of the Hospital Preparedness Instruments in Biological Events.生物事件医院应急准备工具系统评价的COSMIN清单
J Nurs Meas. 2021 Dec 1;29(3):441-461. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00097. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
Measures of ability to learn, grow and make decisions among older persons: a systematic review of measurement properties.老年人学习、成长和决策能力的测量工具:系统评价测量特性。
Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 28;52(Suppl 4):iv118-iv132. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad101.
10
Instruments used to measure dating violence: A systematic review of psychometric properties.用于测量约会暴力的工具:心理测量特性的系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1267-1289. doi: 10.1111/jan.15374. Epub 2022 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Community Participation and Subjective Wellbeing: Mediating Roles of Basic Psychological Needs Among Chinese Retirees.社区参与与主观幸福感:中国退休人员基本心理需求的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 22;12:743897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743897. eCollection 2021.
2
Measuring functional ability in healthy ageing: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in the Philippine older population.测量健康老龄化人群的功能能力:菲律宾老年人群的全国性横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e050827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050827.
3
Development of a social contact self-efficacy scale for 'third agers' in Japan.
日本“第三龄”人群社会交往自我效能感量表的编制。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 22;16(6):e0253652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253652. eCollection 2021.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
5
Validation of Two Intrinsic Capacity Scales and Its Relationship with Frailty and Other Outcomes in Mexican Community-Dwelling Older Adults.验证两种内在能力量表及其与墨西哥社区居住的老年人体弱和其他结局的关系。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1555-5.
6
The Differential Impact of Retirement on Informal Caregiving, Volunteering, and Grandparenting: Results of a 3-Year Panel Study.退休对非正式护理、志愿服务和隔代照料的差异影响:一项为期 3 年的面板研究结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Feb 17;76(3):607-619. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa221.
7
Positive Psychology and Physical Health: Research and Applications.积极心理学与身体健康:研究与应用
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014 Sep 26;10(3):200-206. doi: 10.1177/1559827614550277. eCollection 2016 May-Jun.
8
Psychometric properties the Iranian version of Older People's Quality Of Life questionnaire (OPQOL).《老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL)伊朗版的心理测量特性》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 5;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1002-z.
9
The relationship between functional status, physical fitness and cognitive performance in physically active older adults: A pilot study.体能活跃的老年人的功能状态、体能与认知表现之间的关系:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0194918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194918. eCollection 2018.
10
Evaluating the validity of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (Canadian French version) using classical test theory and item response theory.使用经典测试理论和项目反应理论评估工作角色功能问卷(加拿大法语版)的有效性。
Work. 2017;57(4):501-515. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172585.