Social Wellbeing Research Centre, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ageing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 28;52(Suppl 4):iv118-iv132. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad101.
this study aims to conduct a systematic review on available instruments for measuring older persons' ability to learn, grow and make decisions and to critically review the measurement properties of the identified instruments.
we searched six electronic databases, which include PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, SciELO, ERIC and AgeLine, between January 2000 and April 2022. Reference lists of the included papers were also manually searched. The COSMIN (CONsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines were used to evaluate the measurement properties and the quality of evidence for each instrument.
13 instruments from 29 studies were included for evaluation of their measurement properties. Of the 13 reviewed, 6 were on the ability to learn, 3 were on the ability to grow and 4 were on the ability to make decisions. The review found no single instrument that measured all three constructs in unidimensional or multidimensional scales. Many of the instruments were found to have sufficient overall rating on content validity, structural validity, internal consistency and cross-cultural validity. The quality of evidence was rated as low due to a limited number of related validation studies.
a few existing instruments to assess the ability to learn, grow and make decisions of older people can be identified in the literature. Further research is needed in validating them against functional, real-world outcomes.
本研究旨在对现有的测量老年人学习、成长和决策能力的工具进行系统评价,并对已确定工具的测量特性进行批判性评价。
我们检索了 6 个电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、SciELO、ERIC 和 AgeLine,检索时间为 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月。还手动检索了纳入文献的参考文献列表。使用 COSMIN(健康测量工具选择的共识标准)指南评估每个工具的测量特性和证据质量。
从 29 项研究中纳入了 13 项评估其测量特性的工具。在已审查的 13 项中,6 项用于评估学习能力,3 项用于评估成长能力,4 项用于评估决策能力。审查发现,没有一种工具可以在单一的维度或多维量表中测量所有这三个构念。许多工具在内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性和跨文化效度方面都具有足够的总体评分。由于相关验证研究数量有限,证据质量被评为低。
文献中可以确定一些现有的评估老年人学习、成长和决策能力的工具。需要进一步研究这些工具在功能、真实世界结果方面的验证。