Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
BJU Int. 2024 Mar;133(3):341-350. doi: 10.1111/bju.16210. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
To determine the oncological impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) vs standard PLND (sPLND) during radical cystectomy (RC) in clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa).
In this retrospective, multicentre study we included 969 patients who underwent RC with sPLND (internal/external iliac and obturator lymph nodes) or ePLND (sPLND plus common iliac and presacral nodes) with or without platin-based peri-operative chemotherapy for cTany N1-3 M0 BCa between 1991 and 2022. We assessed the impact of ePLND on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the distribution of recurrences (locoregional and distant recurrences). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We performed propensity-score matching using covariates associated with the extent of PLND in univariable logistic regression analysis. The association of the extent of PLND with RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression models.
Of 969 cN+ patients, 510 were 1:1 matched on propensity scores. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recurrence was 8 (4-16) months, and median (IQR) follow-up of alive patients was 30 (13-51) months. Disease recurrence was observed in 104 patients in the ePLND and 107 in the sPLND group. Of these, 136 (27%), 47 (9.2%) and 19 patients (3.7%) experienced distant, locoregional, or both distant and locoregional disease recurrence, respectively. When stratified by the extent of PLND, we did not find a difference in recurrence patterns (P > 0.05). ePLND improved neither RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.19; P = 0.5) nor OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.01; P = 0.06) compared to sPLND. Stratification by induction chemotherapy did not change outcomes.
Performing an ePLND at the time of RC in cN+ patients improved neither RFS nor OS compared to sPLND, regardless of induction chemotherapy status. Pretreatment risk stratification is paramount to identify ideal candidates for RC with ePLND as part of a multimodal treatment approach.
确定在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)中对临床淋巴结阳性(cN+)膀胱癌(BCa)进行扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)与标准 PLND(sPLND)相比的肿瘤学影响。
在这项回顾性多中心研究中,我们纳入了 969 名患者,他们在 1991 年至 2022 年间接受了 RC 手术,同时进行了 sPLND(髂内/外和闭孔淋巴结)或 ePLND(sPLND 加髂总和骶前淋巴结),或在围手术期接受铂类为基础的化疗。我们评估了 ePLND 对无复发生存率(RFS)和复发部位(局部和远处复发)的影响。次要终点是总生存率(OS)。我们使用单变量逻辑回归分析中与 PLND 范围相关的协变量进行倾向评分匹配。使用 Cox 回归模型研究 PLND 范围与 RFS 和 OS 的关系。
在 969 名 cN+患者中,510 名患者根据倾向评分进行了 1:1 匹配。中位(四分位距 [IQR])复发时间为 8(4-16)个月,存活患者的中位(IQR)随访时间为 30(13-51)个月。在 ePLND 组和 sPLND 组中,分别有 104 名和 107 名患者发生疾病复发。其中,136 名(27%)、47 名(9.2%)和 19 名(3.7%)患者分别出现远处、局部或远处和局部疾病复发。按 PLND 范围分层时,我们未发现复发模式有差异(P>0.05)。与 sPLND 相比,ePLND 并未改善 RFS(风险比 [HR] 0.91,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.70-1.19;P=0.5)或 OS(HR 0.78,95% CI 0.60-1.01;P=0.06)。按诱导化疗分层并未改变结果。
与 sPLND 相比,在 cN+患者的 RC 中进行 ePLND 并不能改善 RFS 或 OS,无论诱导化疗状态如何。在确定理想的 RC 患者时,进行 ePLND 作为多模式治疗方法的一部分,术前风险分层至关重要。