Li Min, Wan Shuling, Wang Nanbu, Chen Jiahao, Duan Jiangang, Chen Jian, Zhang Xuxiang, Meng Ran, Ji Xunming
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Oct 25;16:4783-4794. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S437457. eCollection 2023.
Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare subtype of stroke. However, existing scales were insufficient to evaluate the overall severity of CVT. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a CVT severity scale.
Items 1-11 were directly derived from NIHSS. New items were generated from a literature review and focus group discussion. A total of 170 CVT patients were prospectively recruited from 26 top tertiary hospitals in China Mainland from January 2021 to May 2022 to validate the CVT severity scale. The CVT severity scale, NIHSS, mRS and GCS were rated at admission. The lumbar puncture opening pressure was also recorded. Twenty randomly selected CVT patients were rated with the CVT severity scale again 24 hours later. The clinical outcome of CVT was evaluated by mRS at 6 months after baseline.
We successfully established a CVT severity scale with 18 items. Exploratory factor analysis showed that 18 items were attributed to factor 1 (focal neurological deficits), factor 2 (diffuse encephalopathy), factor 3 (intracranial hypertension) and factor 4 (cavernous sinus syndrome). CVT severity scale was positively correlated with ICP, NIHSS and mRS, and negatively correlated with GCS at baseline. CVT severity scale >3 or factor 3 >2 indicated intracranial hypertension. CVT severity scale >10 indicated poor clinical outcome at 6 months of follow-up. Meanwhile, CVT severity scale showed high internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
The CVT severity scale included 18 items encompassing 4 domains of focal neurological deficits, diffuse encephalopathy, IH and cavernous sinus syndrome. CVT severity scale correlated well with ICP, NIHSS, mRS and GCS. Patients with CVT severity scale >10 can be defined as severe CVT. The CVT severity scale may serve as a valid and reliable tool for measuring the overall severity of CVT.
脑静脉血栓形成(CVT)是一种罕见的中风亚型。然而,现有的量表不足以评估CVT的整体严重程度。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种CVT严重程度量表。
项目1-11直接源自美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)。新的项目通过文献综述和焦点小组讨论产生。2021年1月至2022年5月,从中国大陆26家顶级三级医院前瞻性招募了170例CVT患者,以验证CVT严重程度量表。在入院时对CVT严重程度量表,NIHSS、改良Rankin量表(mRS)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)进行评分。同时记录腰椎穿刺初压。20例随机选择的CVT患者在24小时后再次用CVT严重程度量表进行评分。在基线后6个月,通过mRS评估CVT的临床结局。
我们成功建立了一个包含18个项目的CVT严重程度量表。探索性因素分析表明,18个项目可归为因素1(局灶性神经功能缺损)、因素2(弥漫性脑病)、因素3(颅内高压)和因素4(海绵窦综合征)。在基线时,CVT严重程度量表与颅内压(ICP)、NIHSS和mRS呈正相关,与GCS呈负相关。CVT严重程度量表>3或因素3>2表明存在颅内高压。CVT严重程度量表>10表明随访6个月时临床结局较差。同时,CVT严重程度量表显示出较高的内部一致性和重测信度。
CVT严重程度量表包括18个项目,涵盖局灶性神经功能缺损、弥漫性脑病、颅内高压和海绵窦综合征4个领域。CVT严重程度量表与ICP、NIHSS、mRS和GCS相关性良好。CVT严重程度量表>10的患者可被定义为重度CVT。CVT严重程度量表可作为测量CVT整体严重程度的有效且可靠的工具。