• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募策略和干预措施以增加参与肺癌筛查计划:系统评价方案。

Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Centre for Environmental, Nutritional and Genetic Epidemiology (CREAGEN), Public Health Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e074140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074140.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074140
PMID:37907293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10618983/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite strong evidence for the efficacy of low-radiation dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer (LC) mortality, implementing LC screening (LCS) programmes remains a challenge. We aim to systematically review the evidence on the strategies used to recruit the adult population at risk of LC to LDCT within LCS programmes and to estimate the effectiveness of interventions identified, used to reach the potentially eligible population, increase participation and informed choice, and ensure equitable access.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This sequential systematic literature review will consist of three steps: (1) a scoping review of existing strategies and organisational models for LCS; (2) selecting papers reporting relevant outcomes (test coverage, screening participation and informed choice) and comparing results among different models; (3) a systematic review of interventions implemented to increase participation in LCS programmes. Each step will follow the methodological guidelines provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data sources include electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed version), Embase, CINAHL (Ebsco version), Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2000 to March 2023 in English, Italian, French, Spanish, Serbian and Croatian language. Findings will be synthesised quantitatively and qualitatively as appropriate. Risk of bias assessment will be only applied to studies selected in the second and third steps. The quality of evidence will be summarised for each outcome using the Grading Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Given that this is a review of existing literature, ethics approval is not required. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant conferences. The findings of this review will help guide health authorities in organising LCS programmes and developing recommendations, policies, and actions at national and regional levels.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023408357.

摘要

简介

尽管低辐射剂量 CT(LDCT)在降低肺癌(LC)死亡率方面有强有力的证据,但实施 LC 筛查(LCS)计划仍然是一个挑战。我们旨在系统地回顾用于在 LCS 计划中招募有患 LC 风险的成年人群进行 LDCT 的策略的证据,并估计所确定的干预措施的有效性,这些干预措施用于接触潜在合格人群,增加参与度和知情选择,并确保公平获得。

方法和分析

这是一项序贯系统文献综述,将包括三个步骤:(1)对 LCS 的现有策略和组织模型进行范围综述;(2)选择报告相关结果(测试覆盖率、筛查参与和知情选择)的论文,并比较不同模型之间的结果;(3)系统综述为增加 LCS 计划参与度而实施的干预措施。每个步骤都将遵循 Cochrane 合作组织和系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目提供的方法学指南。数据来源包括电子数据库,如 Medline(PubMed 版本)、Embase、CINAHL(Ebsco 版本)、Scopus 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。搜索将限于 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间以英语、意大利语、法语、西班牙语、塞尔维亚语和克罗地亚语发表的研究。结果将根据需要进行定量和定性综合。仅对第二和第三步中选择的研究进行偏倚风险评估。使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法,对每个结果的证据质量进行总结。

伦理和传播

由于这是对现有文献的综述,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的科学期刊上,并在相关会议上展示。本综述的结果将有助于指导卫生当局组织 LCS 计划,并在国家和地区层面制定建议、政策和行动。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023408357。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9db/10618983/0b6e27ac1686/bmjopen-2023-074140f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9db/10618983/0b6e27ac1686/bmjopen-2023-074140f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9db/10618983/0b6e27ac1686/bmjopen-2023-074140f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol.招募策略和干预措施以增加参与肺癌筛查计划:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e074140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074140.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol.旨在提高肺癌筛查参与度的干预措施及其对重点人群的影响:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e050056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050056.
6
Exploring the evidence for the effectiveness of health interventions for COVID-19 targeting migrants: a systematic review protocol.探索针对移民的 COVID-19 健康干预措施有效性的证据:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 22;11(12):e057985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057985.
7
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for possible sarcopenia or sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review protocol.社区居住的老年人疑似或肌少症的非药物干预措施:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e067079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067079.
9
Telerehabilitation for lower extremity recovery poststroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.远程康复治疗脑卒中后下肢恢复:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e055527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055527.
10
Framework for maternal morbidity and mortality interventions in Ethiopia: a systematic review protocol.埃塞俄比亚孕产妇发病率和死亡率干预措施框架:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):e075879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075879.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung cancer screening in Finland: a prospective randomized trial.芬兰的肺癌筛查:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jun 11;64:769-774. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43093.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of interventions to recognise, refer and diagnose patients with lung cancer symptoms.系统评价干预措施以识别、转介和诊断有肺癌症状的患者。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Oct 18;32(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00312-9.
2
Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Europe: Taking a Systems Approach.在欧洲实施肺癌筛查:采用系统方法。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Apr 22;3(5):100329. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100329. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Updated USPSTF screening guidelines may reduce lung cancer deaths.美国预防服务工作组更新的筛查指南可能会降低肺癌死亡率。
J Fam Pract. 2021 Sep;70(7):347-349. doi: 10.12788/jfp.0257.
4
Participation in lung cancer screening.参与肺癌筛查。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1091-1098. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-917.
5
Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction - evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives.肺癌低剂量 CT 筛查与死亡率降低——证据、陷阱及未来展望。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;18(3):135-151. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00432-6. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
Organized Lung Cancer Screening Pilot: Informing a Province-Wide Program in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省组织性肺癌筛查试点项目:为全省范围项目提供信息支持。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):1805-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.051. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
7
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.解决肺癌筛查资格和医疗保健获取方面的差异。美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):e95-e112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3053ST.
8
Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Testing Targeted Invitation Materials.肺筛检吸收率试验 (LSUT):随机对照临床试验测试靶向邀请材料。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 15;201(8):965-975. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0946OC.
9
Erratum to "Evaluation of a health service adopting proactive approach to reduce high risk of lung cancer: The Liverpool Healthy Lung Programme" [Lung Cancer 134 (August) (2019) 66-71].《对“采用积极方法降低肺癌高风险的健康服务评估:利物浦健康肺计划”的勘误》[《肺癌》134卷(8月)(2019年)66 - 71页]
Lung Cancer. 2020 Jan;139:224. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
10
Lung Cancer Screening Utilization: A Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Analysis.肺癌筛查利用:行为风险因素监测系统分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):250-255. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Jun 24.