Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saeroun Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Bone Joint J. 2023 Nov 1;105-B(11):1189-1195. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B11.BJJ-2023-0450.R1.
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using small and standard baseplates in Asian patients, and to investigate the impact of a mismatch in the sizes of the glenoid and the baseplate on the outcomes.
This was retrospective analysis of 50 and 33 RSAs using a standard (33.8 mm, ST group) and a small (29.5 mm, SM group) baseplate of the Equinoxe reverse shoulder system, which were undertaken between January 2017 and March 2021. Radiological evaluations included the size of the glenoid, the -angle, the inclination of the glenoid component, inferior overhang, scapular notching, the location of the central cage in the baseplate within the vault and the mismatch in size between the glenoid and baseplate. Clinical evaluations included the range of motion (ROM) and functional scores. In subgroup analysis, comparisons were performed between those in whom the vault of the glenoid was perforated (VP group) and those in whom it was not perforated (VNP group).
Perforation of the vault of the glenoid (p = 0.018) and size mismatch in height (p < 0.001) and width (p = 0.013) were significantly more frequent in the ST group than in the SM group. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and ROM in the two groups, two years postoperatively (all p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, the VP group had significantly less inferior overhang (p = 0.009), more scapular notching (p = 0.018), and more size mismatch in height (p < 0.001) and width (p = 0.025) than the VNP group.
In Asian patients with a small glenoid, using a 29.5 mm small baseplate at the time of RSA was more effective in reducing size mismatch between the glenoid and the baseplate, decreasing the incidence of perforation of the glenoid vault, and achieving optimal positioning of the baseplate compared with the use of a 33.8 mm standard baseplate. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the impact of these findings on the clinical outcomes.
本研究旨在比较亚洲患者中使用小尺寸和标准尺寸底座的反式肩关节置换术(RSA)的临床和影像学结果,并探讨肩胛盂和底座尺寸不匹配对结果的影响。
这是对 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间使用 Equinoxe 反式肩关节系统的标准(33.8mm,ST 组)和小(29.5mm,SM 组)底座进行的 50 例和 33 例 RSA 的回顾性分析。影像学评估包括肩胛盂大小、-角、肩胛盂组件倾斜度、下悬垂、肩胛切迹、中央笼在底座中的位置以及肩胛盂和底座之间的尺寸不匹配。临床评估包括活动范围(ROM)和功能评分。在亚组分析中,比较了肩胛盂穹顶穿孔(VP 组)和未穿孔(VNP 组)患者之间的差异。
ST 组肩胛盂穹顶穿孔(p=0.018)和高度(p<0.001)及宽度(p=0.013)尺寸不匹配的发生率明显高于 SM 组。两组患者术后 2 年临床评分和 ROM 无显著差异(均 p>0.05)。在亚组分析中,VP 组下悬垂度明显较小(p=0.009),肩胛切迹较多(p=0.018),高度(p<0.001)和宽度(p=0.025)尺寸不匹配发生率较高。
在肩胛盂较小的亚洲患者中,与使用 33.8mm 标准底座相比,在 RSA 时使用 29.5mm 小底座可更有效地减少肩胛盂和底座之间的尺寸不匹配,降低肩胛盂穹顶穿孔的发生率,并实现底座的最佳定位。然而,需要更长时间的随访来评估这些发现对临床结果的影响。