May Andrew D, Tingey Jamie L, Stucky Kirk J, Kellerman Quinn D, Hosey Megan M
Division of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Division of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Rehabil Psychol. 2024 Feb;69(1):70-73. doi: 10.1037/rep0000524. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: U.S. health organizations, including Division 22 of the American Psychological Association, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society advocate for psychological treatment that improves long-term outcomes in critical illness survivors. However, limited information exists with regard to psychology training opportunities in intensive care settings. We aim to identify and describe (a) existing psychology programs with training in intensive care settings and (b) barriers to finding these training opportunities.
RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Using aspects of the Arksey and O'Malley Framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting checklist as guides, two independent reviewers searched the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers (APPIC) Directory and Universal Psychology Postdoctoral Directory (UPPD) to identify programs with training experiences in intensive care settings.
Searching the APPIC Directory did not reliably or accurately identify training opportunities in intensive care settings. Thus, only programs identified in the more reliable UPPD search were considered for inclusion. After duplicates were removed, searches using the UPPD yielded 31 programs for review. Of those, 22 programs met inclusion, offering heterogeneous training in intensive care settings.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest few opportunities exist for psychology training in intensive care settings and available opportunities are difficult to identify using standard search methods. The identified challenges also emphasize the need for advanced search features for training opportunities within APPIC/UPPD and/or a list of programs offering these training opportunities. Our results highlight the importance of program descriptions that accurately and comprehensively reflect training opportunities-particularly relating to opportunities in intensive care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:包括美国心理学会第22分会、危重病医学会和美国胸科学会在内的美国卫生组织提倡开展心理治疗,以改善危重病幸存者的长期预后。然而,关于重症监护环境中心理学培训机会的信息有限。我们旨在识别并描述(a)在重症监护环境中提供培训的现有心理学项目,以及(b)寻找这些培训机会的障碍。
研究方法/设计:以阿克西和奥马利框架的各方面内容以及系统评价和元分析扩展的范围综述报告清单中的首选报告项目为指导,两名独立评审员搜索了心理学博士后和实习中心协会(APPIC)名录以及通用心理学博士后名录(UPPD),以识别在重症监护环境中有培训经历的项目。
搜索APPIC名录并不能可靠或准确地识别重症监护环境中的培训机会。因此,仅考虑在更可靠的UPPD搜索中识别出的项目纳入研究。去除重复项后,使用UPPD进行的搜索产生了31个可供审查的项目。其中,22个项目符合纳入标准,在重症监护环境中提供了多样化的培训。
结论/启示:这些结果表明,重症监护环境中心理学培训的机会很少,而且使用标准搜索方法很难找到现有的机会。所确定的挑战还强调了APPIC/UPPD中培训机会的高级搜索功能和/或提供这些培训机会的项目清单的必要性。我们的结果凸显了准确、全面反映培训机会的项目描述的重要性,尤其是与重症监护环境中的机会相关的描述。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)