Suppr超能文献

关于肢端肥大症诊断和缓解标准的共识。

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission.

机构信息

San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pituitary. 2024 Feb;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.

摘要

目的

第 14 届肢端肥大症共识会议的目的是讨论肢端肥大症诊断的生化标准和治疗效果评估。

方法

来自 16 个国家的 56 位肢端肥大症专家对目前针对生化检测的证据进行了回顾和讨论;讨论了诊断标准以及影像学、病理学和临床评估的作用;诊断延迟的后果;缓解标准和随访建议;评估和监测在确定疾病进展、选择适当治疗方法和最大化患者结局方面的价值。

结果

在具有典型肢端肥大症特征的患者中,胰岛素样生长因子(IGF)-I>正常年龄上限的 1.3 倍可确诊该病。隔夜禁食后随机测量生长激素(GH)可能有助于预测预后,但并非诊断所必需。对于结果不确定的患者,可以重复使用相同的经过验证的检测方法测量 IGF-I,口服葡萄糖耐量试验也可能有用。虽然生化缓解是治疗效果的主要评估方法,但应在肢端肥大症的临床背景下解读生化结果。随访评估应考虑评估治疗效果的生化评估、评估残余/复发性腺瘤肿块的影像学研究,以及肢端肥大症、其并发症和合并症的临床体征和症状。对于诊断时生化、病理或影像学检查结果不确定的患者,以及对标准治疗方法反应不足的患者,应考虑转诊至多学科垂体中心。

结论

共识建议强调了对肢端肥大症患者中异常 GH 和 IGF-I 的新认识,以及对这种罕见疾病进行专家管理的重要性。

相似文献

1
Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission.关于肢端肥大症诊断和缓解标准的共识。
Pituitary. 2024 Feb;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

2
The feedback loop in pituitary surgery.垂体手术中的反馈回路。
Pituitary. 2025 Aug 30;28(5):95. doi: 10.1007/s11102-025-01569-2.
7
EndoBridge 2024: pearls and highlights.2024年内镜桥接会议:精华与亮点
Hormones (Athens). 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s42000-025-00708-5.

本文引用的文献

3
Modern approach to resistant acromegaly.难治性肢端肥大症的现代治疗方法。
Endocrine. 2023 May;80(2):303-307. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03317-7. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Real-life clinical impact of a five-tiered classification of pituitary tumors.垂体瘤五级分类的现实临床影响。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2022 Nov 29;187(6):893-904. doi: 10.1530/EJE-22-0812. Print 2022 Dec 1.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Acromegaly on Quality of Life.评估肢端肥大症对生活质量的影响。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2022 Dec;51(4):709-725. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
7
Acromegaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.肢端肥大症:发病机制、诊断与治疗。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Nov;10(11):804-826. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00244-3. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验