• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者在线购买健康补充剂和天然产品中的冒险行为:一种扎根理论方法。

Risk-taking in consumers' online purchases of health supplements and natural products: a grounded theory approach.

作者信息

Ang Ju-Ying, Ooi Guat-See, Abd Aziz Fatimatuzzahra', Tong Seng-Fah

机构信息

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

Clinical Research Centre (CRC), Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 3;16(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00645-x.

DOI:10.1186/s40545-023-00645-x
PMID:37924079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10623737/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health supplements and natural products are widely used by the general public to support physical function and prevent disease. Additionally, with the advent of e-commerce, these products have become easily accessible to the general public. Although several theoretical models have been used to explain the use of health supplements and natural products, empirical evidence on how consumers make decisions to purchase online health supplements and natural products remains limited.

METHODS

In this study, a grounded theory approach was used to develop a substantive theoretical model with the aim of investigating the decision-making process of consumers when purchasing health supplements and natural products online. Malaysian adult consumers who had purchased these products via the Internet were either purposively or theoretically sampled. A total of 18 virtual in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted to elicit participants' experiences and priorities in relation to this activity. All the IDIs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using open coding, focus coding and theoretical coding. The analytical interpretations and theoretical concepts were recorded in research memos.

RESULTS

Consumers' decisions to purchase a health supplement or natural product over the Internet are based on a series of assessments regarding the perceived benefits and risks of this activity, which may be related to the product or the process. In the online marketplace, consumers attempt to choose products, online sellers, sales platforms and/or purchase mechanisms with lower perceived risk, which ultimately enhances their confidence in five elements related to the purchase: (1) product effectiveness, (2) product safety, (3) purchase convenience, (4) fair purchase and (5) online security. Consumers take an acceptable level of risk to purchase these products online, and this acceptable level is unique to each individual and is based on their perception of having control over the potential consequences if the worst-case scenario occurs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a substantive theoretical model is developed to demonstrate how consumers decide to purchase online health supplements and natural products by accepting an acceptable level of risk associated with the product or process. The emerging model is potentially transferable to other populations in similar contexts.

摘要

背景

健康补充剂和天然产品被广大公众广泛用于维持身体机能和预防疾病。此外,随着电子商务的出现,这些产品已变得易于被广大公众获取。尽管已有几种理论模型用于解释健康补充剂和天然产品的使用情况,但关于消费者如何做出购买在线健康补充剂和天然产品决策的实证证据仍然有限。

方法

在本研究中,采用扎根理论方法来构建一个实质性理论模型,旨在调查消费者在网上购买健康补充剂和天然产品时的决策过程。通过目的抽样或理论抽样选取了通过互联网购买过这些产品的马来西亚成年消费者。总共进行了18次虚拟深度访谈(IDI),以了解参与者在这一活动中的经历和优先事项。所有IDI均进行了录音并逐字转录。使用开放式编码、聚焦编码和理论编码对数据进行分析。分析性解释和理论概念记录在研究备忘录中。

结果

消费者在互联网上购买健康补充剂或天然产品的决策基于对该活动感知到的益处和风险的一系列评估,这可能与产品或过程有关。在在线市场中,消费者试图选择感知风险较低的产品、在线卖家、销售平台和/或购买机制,这最终增强了他们对与购买相关的五个要素的信心:(1)产品有效性,(2)产品安全性,(3)购买便利性,(4)公平购买,(5)网络安全。消费者愿意承担可接受水平的风险在网上购买这些产品,并且这个可接受水平因人而异,基于他们认为如果最坏情况发生能够控制潜在后果的认知。

结论

在本研究中,构建了一个实质性理论模型,以展示消费者如何通过接受与产品或过程相关的可接受风险水平来决定购买在线健康补充剂和天然产品。这个新出现的模型有可能适用于类似背景下的其他人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/10623737/3fe9c7fd519b/40545_2023_645_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/10623737/e8132defa234/40545_2023_645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/10623737/3fe9c7fd519b/40545_2023_645_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/10623737/e8132defa234/40545_2023_645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/10623737/3fe9c7fd519b/40545_2023_645_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-taking in consumers' online purchases of health supplements and natural products: a grounded theory approach.消费者在线购买健康补充剂和天然产品中的冒险行为:一种扎根理论方法。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 3;16(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00645-x.
2
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.社交商务平台上消费者的决策过程:在线信任、感知风险与购买意愿
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020.
3
Public Awareness of Consumer Products Containing Radioactive Materials: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia.公众对含有放射性材料的消费品的认知:来自马来西亚的实证证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042326.
4
Effect of Product Presentation Videos on Consumers' Purchase Intention: The Role of Perceived Diagnosticity, Mental Imagery, and Product Rating.产品展示视频对消费者购买意愿的影响:感知诊断性、心理意象和产品评级的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 17;13:812579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812579. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Background Fitting of e-Commerce Live Streaming on Consumers' Purchase Intentions: A Cognitive-Affective Perspective.电子商务直播背景拟合对消费者购买意愿的影响:认知-情感视角
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jan 19;16:149-168. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S393492. eCollection 2023.
6
The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers' purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior.贴上标签的影响力:对于消费者的购买决策和购买后行为而言,绿色标签比相互矛盾的产品信息更具分量。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 23;6:1392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392. eCollection 2015.
7
Green Consumer Profiling and Online Shopping of Imperfect Foods: Extending UTAUT with Web-Based Label Quality for Misshapen Organic Produce.绿色消费者剖析与不完美食品的网络购物:通过基于网络的畸形有机农产品标签质量扩展技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)
Foods. 2024 May 2;13(9):1401. doi: 10.3390/foods13091401.
8
Evaluating the frequency, consumers' motivation and perception of online medicinal, herbal, and health products purchase safety in Saudi Arabia.评估沙特阿拉伯在线购买药品、草药和健康产品的频率、消费者动机及对其安全性的认知。
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Feb;29(2):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.12.017. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
Analysis of Chinese consumers' willingness and behavioral change to purchase Green agri-food product online.分析中国消费者对绿色农产品在线购买的意愿和行为变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0265887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265887. eCollection 2022.
10
The Promotion and Optimization of Bank Financial Products Using Consumers' Psychological Perception.基于消费者心理认知的银行理财产品推广与优化
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:926271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926271. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Published Literature on the Contributions of the Natural Health Products (NHPs) Industry to Pharmacovigilance for NHPs.关于天然健康产品行业对天然健康产品药物警戒贡献的已发表文献的范围综述。
Drug Saf. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01587-w.
2
Vietnamese people's behavior and future intention to purchase medicines and functional foods on the internet: a cross-sectional study.越南人在互联网上购买药品和功能食品的行为及未来意向:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75029-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use for the Purpose of COVID-19 Prevention in Japan.日本预防 COVID-19 时使用膳食补充剂的流行情况。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 5;14(15):3215. doi: 10.3390/nu14153215.
2
Factors Affecting E-Shopping Behaviour: Application of Theory of Planned Behaviour.影响电子购物行为的因素:计划行为理论的应用。
Behav Neurol. 2021 Nov 23;2021:1664377. doi: 10.1155/2021/1664377. eCollection 2021.
3
Correction to: Online medication purchasing during the Covid-19 pandemic: a pilot study from the United Arab Emirates.
对《新冠疫情期间的在线药品采购:来自阿拉伯联合酋长国的一项试点研究》的更正
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 May 11;14(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00324-9.
4
Why Do We Take Risks? Perception of the Situation and Risk Proneness Predict Domain-Specific Risk Taking.我们为何冒险?对情境的认知和风险倾向预测特定领域的冒险行为。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 8;12:562381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562381. eCollection 2021.
5
Regulatory landscape of dietary supplements and herbal medicines from a global perspective.全球视角下的膳食补充剂和草药的监管格局。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;114:104647. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104647. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Nutraceutical regulations: An opportunity in ASEAN countries.营养保健品法规:东盟国家的一个机遇。
Nutrition. 2020 Jun;74:110729. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110729. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
7
Consumer internet purchasing of medicines using a population sample: A mixed methodology approach.消费者通过互联网购买药品:基于人群样本的混合方法研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jun;16(6):819-827. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.056. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
8
Dietary Supplement Use Among Chinese Primary School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hunan Province.中国小学生的膳食补充剂使用情况:湖南省的一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 29;16(3):374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030374.
9
Problems and Prospects: Public Health Regulation of Dietary Supplements.问题与展望:膳食补充剂的公共卫生监管
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:403-420. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013638. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Adverse Effects of Nutraceuticals and Dietary Supplements.营养保健品和膳食补充剂的不良影响。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Jan 6;58:583-601. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052844. Epub 2017 Oct 6.