Suppr超能文献

电针对溃疡性结肠炎患者的疗效:一项荟萃分析及穴位选择研究。

Electroacupuncture for ulcerative colitis patients: A meta-analysis and acupoints selection study.

作者信息

Hao Jianheng, Zhao Yuemeng, Cao Yuxia, Wang Haijun, Ji Laixi

机构信息

College of Acupuncture and Massage, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China.

College of the Second Clinical, Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, 030619, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Oct 19;9(11):e20789. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20789. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) on ulcerative colitis (UC) and explore the influence of EA parameters and acupoint compatibility to optimize the clinical treatment plan.

METHODS

After searching eight databases, data were extracted and analyzed to determine the quality and bias of the study's methodological design, and randomized controlled trial (RCT) datas were meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies that meet the criteria were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, compared with the control group, experimental group had better clinical efficacy [RR = 1.27, 95%CI = (1.19, 1.36),  < 0.01], Other indicators such as cure rate [RR = 1.73, 95%CI = (1.43, 2.09),  < 0.01], effective rate of mucosal lesions under enteroscopy [RR = 1.24, 95%CI = (1.11, 1.38),  < 0.01], serum inflammatory factor TNF-α [MD = -41.11, 95%CI = (-46.01, 36.22),  < 0.01] were significantly better than those in the control group. Sixteen acupoints on the Ren, Bladder, Stomach, Spleen, and Liver meridians were used 74 times. RN4-ST25 is the most compatible acupoints.

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy of EA in treating UC is superior than the control group's, and it has curative effects in terms of cure rate, efficacy of mucosal lesions under colonoscopy, serum inflammatory factors, and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome scores. Combining acupoints of the Bladder, Stomach, and Ren meridians and using dense wave for 30 min each time for more than 6 weeks may be optimal for UC patients.

摘要

目的

评估电针(EA)治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的疗效和安全性,并探讨电针参数及穴位配伍的影响,以优化临床治疗方案。

方法

检索八个数据库后,提取并分析数据,以确定研究方法设计的质量和偏倚,并对随机对照试验(RCT)数据进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入12项符合标准的研究。荟萃分析结果表明,与对照组相比,试验组临床疗效更好[RR = 1.27,95%CI =(1.19,1.36),P < 0.01],治愈率[RR = 1.73,95%CI =(1.43,2.09),P < 0.01]、肠镜下黏膜病变有效率[RR = 1.24,95%CI =(1.11,1.38),P < 0.01]、血清炎症因子TNF-α[MD = -41.11,95%CI =(-46.01,-36.22),P < 0.01]等其他指标均显著优于对照组。任脉、膀胱经、胃经、脾经和肝经上的16个穴位共使用74次。RN4-ST25是配伍最多的穴位。

结论

电针治疗UC的临床疗效优于对照组,在治愈率、结肠镜下黏膜病变疗效、血清炎症因子及中医证候评分方面均有疗效。结合膀胱经、胃经和任脉穴位,每次使用疏密波30分钟,持续6周以上,可能对UC患者最为适宜。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a1/10623169/c58fb96ec702/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验